Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: bray

There are three issues tied to this.

1. You need to have a Metro situation that works in city ‘A’ and as you exit in city ‘B’....the same type of structure exists where you don’t need a car. As far as I can see...only NYC and Washington DC qualify in this case. I can’t think of another location that offers city-wide Metro like you’d find in Paris, Berlin, or the Hague.

2. Even if you built a bullet train....it needs to go from city to city, with no stops in between. So you build it from LA to San Francisco....then you inform everyone along the way that they can’t hop on board. Why use it then?

3. Costs and environmental push-back. To suggest building a bullet-train between Chicago and Atlanta, to watch for the twelve-year court battle by environmentalists to prevent it. Why bother? Just build airports and launch planes.


14 posted on 05/26/2019 6:02:46 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: pepsionice

Why take a 200 mph train when you can take a 500 mph plane?


26 posted on 05/26/2019 6:26:47 AM PDT by bray (Pray for President Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson