I didn't post this on a blog because I didn't want Humblegunner complaining I'm trying to pimp a blog. But I do hate that I have to put this in bloggers. This is a pretty big point most everyone has missed. I bet you hear about it in a day or two. Maybe Tucker Carlson will be smart enough to catch this.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
To: for-q-clinton; JesseWatters
49 posted on
04/19/2019 12:15:28 PM PDT by
hoosiermama
(When you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice.DJT)
To: for-q-clinton
bump (for use against liberal sister)
50 posted on
04/19/2019 12:19:49 PM PDT by
READINABLUESTATE
(Sharia law, which in itself is antithetical to the United States Constitution - Judge Jeanie Pirro)
To: for-q-clinton
If Mueller couldn’t even get something as simple as this correct (and we all know he could but that wasn’t his goal), then the whole report should be disregarded.
51 posted on
04/19/2019 12:20:28 PM PDT by
liberalh8ter
(The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.)
To: for-q-clinton
Why hasn’t this been shown as proof that the Mueller report is anti-Trump not a fair investigation. And can someone say who is thee individual who wrote this sentence, which is so clearly false and biased.
55 posted on
06/03/2019 6:38:06 AM PDT by
poinq
To: for-q-clinton
What’s the point of redacting that when we all know Roger Stone has been charged. Is it likely to be someone else?
If the wikileaks info started to come out in March why are they up in arms about June and July conversations about what may yet come? Just part of a false narrative.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson