Mueller had to keep his Anti-Trump people happy who were getting paid big bucks to play this political game.
Oh and the report was a flat out lie when it said it FIRST released Hillary’s emails in July. They were first released in March.
Good eye!
You can post your own blog IF you also copy it here.
Blog pimping is only when you post a snippet here, and force freepers to go to your site for the rest.
Then you incur the wrath of HG.
Mueller the hack....plain and simple.
Also missing: the emails were, in fact, genuine, and actual proof of hillary’s various misdeeds and corruption.
For the timeline:
Murder of Seth Rich
Date: July 10, 2016
The question remains: why isn’t Hillary being investigated for crimes involving collusion with Russia, among other things? And with her, Obama, Valerie, Huma, and a bunch of others? Democrats have proven how phony they are by ignoring the real culprits.
Humblegunner can be a real pain about this. I would ignore him.
btt
The Conspirators spearphished individuals affiliated with the Clinton Campaign throughout the summer of 2016. For example, on or about July 27, 2016, the Conspirators attempted after hours to spearphish for the first time email accounts at a domain hosted by a thirdparty provider and used by Clinton’s personal office.
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/80-netyksho-et-al-indictment/ba0521c1eef869deecbe/optimized/full.pdf?action=click&module=Intentional&pgtype=Article
The New York Time spun that sentence into the following headline:
Trump Invited the Russians to Hack Clinton. Were They Listening?
Other left wing outlets cite that as evidence of collusion.
So ask yourself this question: when has a prosecutor ever gone out of their way to note that a criminal they are charging committed a crime "for the first time". Imagine "On Jan 1, the shoplifter, for the first time, attempted to steal several items from Walmart."
They were clearly trying to create exactly the sort of negative inference you discovered, despite the fact that even according to their own indictment the hackers were trying to hack several "individuals affiliated with the Clinton Campaign throughout the summer of 2016." Did they really need Trump to give them the idea of hacking Hillary??
I'm betting that:
1. "on or about July 27, 2016" turns out to be July 26 or before"
2. It wasn't the first time they tried to hack Hilalry's office at all.
Trump was just kidding, making a joke.
This is beyond ridiculous, and the fact that this inane bs is even mentioned in that report is just more evidence that Washington and the government in-crowd are truly amongst the least talented but most nefarious and unethical people in America from sea to shining sea. There is bread mold that has more ability and credibility than many who hold government titles. It is beyond sad. Truly.
Mueller and the hackjob idiots....plain and simple.
Some of the supposed obstruction arguments are real stretches, one amounts to arguing that publicly expressing positive opinions about someone on trial is obstruction of justice.
But if that is true then one half of the country and every news broadcaster is guilty of obstruction of justice. As an example, how many people expressed opinions about OJ Simpson during his trial? How many people expressed opinions, positive or negative, about Paul Manafort during his trial?
It is a real stretch to think that the federal obstruction of justice statute overrides the 1st Amendment and prohibits public statements which conceivably could influence the result of an ongoing trial.
More importantly, it was also AFTER Hillary's server was shut down.
Nice catch!
I want our $22M back, Mueller.
The Wikileaks emails were from the DNC and Podesta. The hiLIARy emails that President Trump was mocking the media about are still missing.
I bet Bar almost spit when he saw they had added Trump’s tongue-in-cheek quip about maybe Russia could find the missing emails to the official report...shows unadulterated bias and grasping at straws on their part....not professional at all.