Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No one caught this yet in Mueller's report. Proof of Bias.
Time, WikiLeaks, CNN ^ | 18 Apr 2018 | For-Q-Clinton

Posted on 04/18/2019 2:17:32 PM PDT by for-q-clinton

At the beginning of Mueller's report I see he really wanted to and nail trump but couldn't so he would at least give false impressions.

Mueller says "Around the same time" as if Trump asked for Russian help and THEN WikiLeaks gave up the info.

Well Mueller KNOWS exact time and date each of these occurred. But he didn't put that in here instead he used weasel language of "around the same time". No it wasn't around the same time. In fact, WikiLeaks actually released the info in March WikiLeaks).

And then on 13 June we knew WikiLeaks was going to release more emails Time Article'

Then the release Mueller uses is the one on 22 July Washington Post Article).

Trump joked about Russia helping the US press on 26 July--AFTER WikiLeaks gave up their Hillary emails. Politico Article

They aren't related as Mueller is trying to imply--Trump didn't ask for them and then WikiLeaks gave them. Instead Trump joked about it AFTER wikiLeaks dumped the emails. And made fun of the American Press.

(Excerpt) Read more at time.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: hoax; mueller; muellerreport; russia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: edwinland

Here is what I noticed. From the section on obstruction of justice:

“During the press conference, Trump repeated, “I have nothing to do with Russia” five times. He stated that “the closest [he] came to Russia” was that Russians may have purchased a home or condos from him. He said that after he held the Miss America pageant in Moscow in 2013 he had been interested in working with Russian companies that “wanted to put a lot of money into developments in Russia” but “it never worked out.” He explained, “[f]rankly, I didn’t want to do it for a couple of different reasons. But we had a major developer...that wanted to develop property in Moscow and other places. But we decided not to do it.” The Trump Organization, however, had been pursuing a building project in Moscow - the Trump Tower Moscow project - from approximately September 2015 through June 2016, and the candidate was regularly updated on developments, including possible trips by Michael Cohen to Moscow to promote the deal and by Trump himself to finalize it.”

If self-serving statements made in a press conference count as possible obstruction of justice, then Washington DC needs a prison wall built around the entire damn city!

Guess I missed the part where media hacks are Dept of Justice investigators. Heck, Trump could have claimed to have a schlong 20 feet long at a press conference. So what? Doesn’t make it obstruction of justice if Mueller takes out a tape measure and says it is only 19’ 8”.


41 posted on 04/18/2019 6:25:31 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

The Wikileaks emails were from the DNC and Podesta. The hiLIARy emails that President Trump was mocking the media about are still missing.


42 posted on 04/18/2019 7:40:48 PM PDT by JoeRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chief lee runamok

That’s the truth not being covered. Disgraceful!

“Also missing: the emails were, in fact, genuine, and actual proof of hillary’s various misdeeds and corruption.”


43 posted on 04/18/2019 7:56:21 PM PDT by cazmandeuce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

I bet Bar almost spit when he saw they had added Trump’s tongue-in-cheek quip about maybe Russia could find the missing emails to the official report...shows unadulterated bias and grasping at straws on their part....not professional at all.


44 posted on 04/19/2019 3:28:13 AM PDT by trebb (Don't howl about illegal leeches while not donating to FR - it's hypocritical.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: altura; for-q-clinton; humblegunner
Humblegunner can be a real pain about this. I would ignore him.

Humble's primary objections are to bloggers who only post teasers to generate clicks for their blogs, and those who steal content from other sources and claim it as their own. Free Republic shouldn't be a click farm.

45 posted on 04/19/2019 3:44:27 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (Trump: "America will never be a socialist country!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind

Being mean ,hateful and VILE are not attributes to proud of.


46 posted on 04/19/2019 4:06:21 AM PDT by sausageseller (If you want to cut your own throat, don't come to me for a bandage. M, Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: sausageseller
Being mean ,hateful and VILE are not attributes to proud of.

Awww... what's the matter, Spunky?

Diddums get hims little butt hurt?

Go sniff a sausage.

47 posted on 04/19/2019 4:24:51 AM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

“force freepers to go to your site”

You’d have better luck trying to herd cats.


48 posted on 04/19/2019 5:17:01 AM PDT by kanawa (Trump Loves a Great Deal (NorthernSentinel))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton; JesseWatters

Take note Jesse!


49 posted on 04/19/2019 12:15:28 PM PDT by hoosiermama (When you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice.DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

bump (for use against liberal sister)


50 posted on 04/19/2019 12:19:49 PM PDT by READINABLUESTATE (Sharia law, which in itself is antithetical to the United States Constitution - Judge Jeanie Pirro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton
If Mueller couldn’t even get something as simple as this correct (and we all know he could but that wasn’t his goal), then the whole report should be disregarded.
51 posted on 04/19/2019 12:20:28 PM PDT by liberalh8ter (The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #52 Removed by Moderator

Comment #53 Removed by Moderator

To: From The Deer Stand

Because the FBI/DOJ gave them immunity.


54 posted on 06/01/2019 9:36:01 AM PDT by Engedi (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

Why hasn’t this been shown as proof that the Mueller report is anti-Trump not a fair investigation. And can someone say who is thee individual who wrote this sentence, which is so clearly false and biased.


55 posted on 06/03/2019 6:38:06 AM PDT by poinq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

What’s the point of redacting that when we all know Roger Stone has been charged. Is it likely to be someone else?

If the wikileaks info started to come out in March why are they up in arms about June and July conversations about what may yet come? Just part of a false narrative.


56 posted on 06/06/2019 2:06:28 PM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monkeyshine

Exactly. It’s a false narrative. Technically it’s not wrong because he said around the same time. Which means nothing but the impression it gives is that they did it for Trump.


57 posted on 06/06/2019 5:30:04 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (This article needs a fact checked)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

The Mueller report is full of exact dates but here they say “about the same time”. As you said, just to create a misleading impression. It’s not even sequentially correct according to the facts mentioned in the OP.

And while we’re at it, it was Clinton who brought Russia into it when she accused Russia of hacking her server. Trump didn’t insert Russia into the conversation, Clinton did. Trump poked fun at her foibles with his remarks.

Though I admit I don’t know for certain if Trump didn’t mention it before July 26th this post claims that was the first time. In any case, it was Clinton who brought Russia into the conversation first.

But, Mueller does claim Trump campaign first started chattering about it in June, and Mueller claims WikiLeaks first released emails in June but we know that WikiLeaks first put up some of the emails three months prior. So it has to be intentional - or so ridiculously sloppy esp considering Papadopoulos was indicted for getting the date of his Downer meeting wrong.


58 posted on 06/06/2019 7:08:32 PM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: monkeyshine; for-q-clinton

^ I mean the DNC server.

Though, not sure the timing, it had been speculated that foreign governments accessed her private server too.


59 posted on 06/06/2019 7:10:08 PM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson