Posted on 01/05/2019 4:24:28 PM PST by RArtfulogerDodger
[PHOTO]
Very nice talk from a supposedly prim, devout Muslima whose parents languish, or languished, or something, back in der Heimat: Palestine.
An elected USA Congresswoman—a Muslim—who chose to be sworn in on the Islamic Koran, while wearing Palestinian robes, and the first thing she does is shout an obscenity and threaten the President Of The United States of America.
Hey—suburban housewives, and other mad Democrats—you voted for her. You elected her. Get ready now—get ready to know it, live it, and love it. For two (2) entire years.
Oh...here’s a NON-Photoshopped picture of the Grand Islamic Mufti with Adolph Hitler back in der Heimat.
[PHOTO]
Oh...wait, here’s another picture of the Grand Islamic Mufti with his NAZI allies:
[PHOTO]
Wait—here’s something more “today” and “down” with Palestine:
[PHOTO]
I don’t give a flying damn what kind of lies, cover-stories, or reasoning this Koran-swearing Muslima, Rashida Tlaib, gives. I don’t care what distractions she creates. I don’t care what backflip, tap-dance or hypnotic gestures she throws. In my opinion she’s just another lying anti-semite and baseless hater of Trump, Americans, and Trump’s-America.
A Friday-published Washington Post opinion editorial — written by Molly Roberts and entitled “What so wrong with motherf***er?” — dismisses criticisms of Rep. Rashida Tlaib’s (D-MI) derision of President Donald Trump as a “motherf****r,” framing concerns of “civility” as manifestations of “linguistic timidity.”
At a Thursday evening MoveOn.org-hosted event in Washington, DC, hours after her swearing-in ceremony as a congresswoman, Tlaib [had] said, “We’re going to go in and impeach the motherf**ker.”
—Breitbart.Com
Why is this Woman’s language censored? Why is a woman—and Muslim—being censored? Where is her “Freedom?” Of speech, religion, movement, mouth, body, and all that other sacred, chick-stuff?
And what is so mysterious that it needs to be “ *** ” —about the WORD WHICH I SHOW ABOVE IN THE PHOTO?
I mean—I am not spelling it out here because I have to consider Mark Zuckerman’s sensibilities, and those of other search engines. As far as I know, search engines don’t read what it says in a photo.
But why is it censored by Big Leftist Media which do not have to fear Zuck, Twitter, Facebook, Google, or ANY other Leftist search engine, publication, or propaganda juggernaut?
I mean—to hear or see that word, I can just checkout almost any rap music, or any “protest” sign, or any modern hipster who’s live-streaming from their kitchen over a beer and politics. Right? That word is seemingly EVERYwhere.
[PHOTO]
Google.com
[PHOTO]
So why censor it, when it's the simple truth of what she actually said.
Is the word so bad—evil—that it calls for censorship? Since a woman—and Muslima—said it, why not praise it? Sing it’s glories and benefits to America?
I mean—that’s what Democrats do. As my sainted, south Philly mother used to say, they:
“PICK UP HORSE SHIT AND RUN WITH IT.”
Agreed. I've said as much many times. There are RINOs because there are RINO voters. There are muslims in Congress because there are muslim voters. Idiots like this will keep getting elected unless those voters can be reached and reasoned with. However certain areas of the country are just politically lost.
My post @ #16 needs to be clarified as I didn’t know the witch from MI took the oath in islamic garb...And NO, I will not capitalize the “I”. I thought it was the one from MN...
The one from MI wasn’t dressed in her costume in the group photo of all the women sworn in...
http://time.com/5494280/democratic-women-house-of-representatives/
And the poster (I will go back and reply to that one) who said she no sooner took the oath but what she turned around and spoke the words she spoke.....Now Nancy can tell us that we are mistaken and it’s perfectly ok to SWEAR to protect the Constitution of the United States and go on to insult all of us. It’s the best description of this creature’s behavior yet...
“”So, she takes this oath then her first act is to call for the overthrow of the legally elected President of the United States.””
The absolute best comment on this event that I’ve seen. Pelosi needs to defend this - someone sitting in the House has no intention of keeping her oath...We’ve been inundated with this creature’s potty mouth and for myself, I couldn’t get my head wrapped around exactly what WAS SO TERRIBLY WRONG but you put your finger on it. Isn’t it kind of like taking marriage vows one minute and going off immediately on a trip with someone you didn’t marry? Simply put but true, yes?
Thank you so much for your post that was absolutely accurate on each and every count!
This Marxist excuse for a human with her obvious arrogant attitude and disrespect for our country and our values will make quite the illustrative 2020 campaign ad. In fact, many ads. Another ad that I’m looking forward to is the one with Her Highness Pelosi not meeting with Brian Kolfage, the veteran who started the GoFundMe website, for “Our” Wall. Personally, I can’t wait to see Her Highness showing the world what a vile, pompous ass she is put in 2020 campaign ads. I’m sure millions of patriotic veterans will hate the vile Pelosi even more.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3717601/posts
Sworn in on a Book of Lies. How appropriate!
I’ve gotta’ name for her: Rash-in-my Tlabia.
They will have to have a think tank meeting on that one. LOL
Brought to you by people who call themselves Progressives.
“”Sworn in on a Book of Lies. How appropriate!””
Another great comment - you folks are fast thinkers and so to the point accurate!!
Don’t think I should post the pic.
Human trash. Straight out of her district trailer park.
Looks like democrats have found their new age John Wilkes Booth. How this terrorist is not indicted is beyond me.
Trump was spot on in his response to her.
A sworn oath means nothing to these people. A special kind of hate for America.
Bush had the perfect opportunity to really get hold of the laws being broken by over stayed VIsas and illegal immigration. He did zero. Welcomed them with open arms because he was such a weakling.
Sworn in on a book of laws other then our own. That is a direct violation of the constitution. It doesn’t get any more straight forward then that.
She could be shut down for making terroristic threats, but evidently no one in charge cares. If Trump actually went down his job description in itemized form with reasons for each duty, he’d pull the plug on this bitch yesterday.
The trouble is that due to gerrymandering, there was no one with enough integrity to go up against her. Sort of like Cortez, except planned—not just a fluke.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
