Posted on 11/05/2018 1:12:33 PM PST by Based Newsman
Dems, like the lady running for governor in GA are bad at math. They think by flipping 18 seats they win the house. They forget that we are flipping seats too.....plenty of slam dunks.
Reps keep razor thin majority.
Ct. is dying/on the edge of the cliff, hanging on by the tips of its fingernails. :-(
Is it? Don’t really know much about the state.
Yes, Ct. is a basket case; the Dems have just about DESTROYED the state and the RINOS haven’t helped any either. :-(
I’ve not seen them.
In what way, if you don’t mind?
I’m going to predict the GOP will GAIN at least ten seats in the House. Maybe even fifteen.
And some of these gains will be shocking surprises.
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Connecticut might elect Bob Stefanowski as governor and if the CT GOP there have a great night, we might flip the state Senate (we need 19 seats of 36 seats), the assembly will be tougher...(my hometown I grew up has 3 seats in the assembly and my hometown is very Dem.).
I’m with you, Meggee-poo.
“Meggee-poo”
No one’s ever called me that before! I like it! Gives me a nice cuddly feeling! Thank you!
(-:
They tie him into being anti Trump reminding voters of Immigration—Supreme Court —Gun control—Obamacare etc etc
Everything a Trump voter would be against
As I predicted Months ago, few pollsters were willing to call any Senate races as flip GOP.
They have so many Toss Ups or Dem gain.
RCP with no Toss Ups gave GOP +1 Does tie go to GOP challengers?... er, um no!
That’s funny :)
I don’t know what sent NJ so blue.
It once wasn’t and not 100 years ago either.
I'm praying for a miracle win.
Actually this is a big factor on the accuracy of polling. Some states define early voting by party and some states do not. Thus the wild card in trying to define early voting in states that do not define by party affiliation. A big turn out in traditional democrat voting areas does today not translate to a democrat vote.
The real answer is as follows"
Most polls are political polls with an agenda and most particularly those of the Main Stream Media. They are to be ignored
Donald Trump is a phenomena far outside of normal politics and thus polling via normal statistical methods becomes invalid as the statistical base has changed greatly on those polling do not know the changes.
In reality honest polls do not really know what the hell will happen tomorrow. Scott Rasmussen in the past has been the most accurate. However today that is no longer his site, (I think he sold it) but they seem to continue Scott Rasmussen methodology of political polling.
Tomorrow I will drink in celebration or sadness
It ain’t over until James Carville puts the wastebasket over his head.
I remember both her and her husband looking like idiots when Trumps was running and stuttering on their words.Their words mean nothing to me now.They fell out of favor because they could not take a stand.
Odd story about Mary and Cue Ball. He and Mary were dating and working for opposite campaigns i.e. Clinton and Bush. For ethical reasons they cut off communications between each other during the campaign. One of the High ups in Clinton’s campaign called his similar in the Bush campaign and asked them to have Mary please answer James’s calls because they could not stand all his whining.
I remembe that well too and can’t wait for a repeat of that! :-)
Too funny! :-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.