I know. This is my unscientific views. It looks like that based on normalizing data received.
It looks like, for the Senate, a good night.
Not going to try the entire 435 House, as I did this whole thing by hand.
Duly noted.
I thought about this on the way into the office. If we take the Senate, we’re in good shape. That ensures Trump’s future SCOTUS picks will be confirmed. A Democrat house would be held in check, for the most part, as the Senate wouldn’t be so quick to move along legislation, and there’s little chance they achieve a veto-proof majority.
If nothing else, a Democrat House would mean gridlock, and they’ll just bang the drum that Trump is not abiding the will of the people. Then again, we’ve got all chambers now, and there’s gridlock.
You only have 99 seats. I think you’re missing Utah.
I am in Wisconsin. I am curious why you are calling a surprise. I would love that. But havent seen any polling that looks good.
Double posted in middle. Cruz not Turnover, it is Retain
so sorry, no double post by you, just Cruz error
Cruz should not be a turnover. It’s a retain!
i think there is an error. Your numbers didn’t change on the Stabnow row from previous.
Accurate, but the timing is unfortunate.
Comments?
They could lose 10 seats and they would still claim victory if they flip a Republican in a blue district.
They will claim the blue Wave was real, but Republicans cheated and stole the midterms.
At this point they still think that “hearings” and “investigations” will delay conservative progress.
2016-2018, how’s that worked out so far.....
They (left-wing cratzies) still don’t get that Trump gives Republicans what few Republicans presidents have, results!.
They still don’t get the anti establishment nature of the movement. They have pushed us so far left that, center left voters, are closer to Republicans than Democrats.
They still don’t get that identity politics promises everyone can have power and control. At some point each group starts fighting to gain control of the movement and conquer the reigns of power. They (left-wing cratzies) had set their own up for tyranny with in.
We have already been labelled enemies of the liberal/progressive state by the Democratic party. If they regain control, laws will be created to make conservatism a hate crime.
If they don’t take back control in November, be prepared to see those snow flake become flamming balls of methane.....
feinswine is running against another democrap. no pubbies on ticket, so automatic democrap retain.
Don’t see anything on Casey-Barletta in Pennsylvania - could be a turnover with Barletta an attractive Trump-like candidate for the ‘pubs - Trump’s even been in state to campaign for him - but his campaign is pretty lackluster - a couple of good TV ads attacking Casey’s record of non-achievement but not much else that I can see - Casey’s got a couple of ads running emphasizing his “bipartisan” achievements, as meager as they are, and may squeak by - on the other hand I’m in the Philly area - since Pennsylvania was once described as Philadelphia and Pittsburg with Alabama in between - it was Alabama that gave Penna to Trump, and Barletta is probably concentrating his efforts there - he could pull it out......
I’d love to see Murphy go down, I think Connecticut might get a red wave in Hartford.
Good work! I actually think PA is in play. The dems used to have 4 areas in PA: Scranton, Harrisburg, Pittsburg (plus Southwest PA), and Philly. Trump has knocked off Scranton and is well on his way to Pittsburg (having already obtained Southwest PA). Plus he boosted Erie. Philly was already voting at 105% of registered voters. It will be hard to boost that kind of turnout.