Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/13/2018 9:15:38 AM PDT by w1n1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: All

No need to choose.
No need to decide.

Why not have both ?!?!?


2 posted on 06/13/2018 9:19:38 AM PDT by LegendHasIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w1n1

If I could only have one of the two I would go with the AR-10. I think 30 caliber rifles are just a lot more fun to shoot. But, the ammo is more expensive and heavier.


3 posted on 06/13/2018 9:20:57 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w1n1

I trained on an M14 and carried an M16 (in VietNam) and my son has an AR15 today. I chose an AR10 for myself.

Both great guns; I have a passion for .308 Winchester.


4 posted on 06/13/2018 9:21:46 AM PDT by budj (combat vet, 2nd of 3 generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w1n1

The best one is the AR-47! ;)


5 posted on 06/13/2018 9:23:19 AM PDT by robroys woman (So you're not confused, I'm using my wife's account.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w1n1

This is like the noisy debate whether the .270 or the 30-06 is a better round. Owners of either one are very happy, so it doesn’t matter.

If the fecal matter hits the air mover, mobility is an issue. If you have to lug 1000 rounds in a box and run a mile, which caliber would you like to lug?


8 posted on 06/13/2018 9:28:47 AM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w1n1
Not again! Idiotic comparisons that even conclude, at least this one, that there is no right or final answer. The hunting discussion is odd since a .223 or 5.56 is too small in many states for big game hunting.

I don't have an AR-10 (yet). I've got a .308 Winchester bolt action for out to 1,000 yards (but haven't done that yet either).

9 posted on 06/13/2018 9:31:37 AM PDT by Reno89519 (No Amnesty! No Catch-and-Release! Just Say No to All Illegal Aliens! Arrest & Deport!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w1n1

Ar15 in 6.5 Grendel. Best of both worlds.


11 posted on 06/13/2018 9:36:32 AM PDT by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w1n1

I read the title as A-10 vs AR-15, lol.


17 posted on 06/13/2018 10:12:56 AM PDT by IllumiNaughtyByNature (HTTP 500 - Internal Server Error)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w1n1; All
 photo good15.jpg

Help FR Continue the Conservative Fight!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help To Keep FR In The Battle !!


Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


21 posted on 06/13/2018 10:16:06 AM PDT by musicman (The future is just a collection of successive nows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w1n1

AR-15s are being used out to 800m in matches, using 69, 77 and 80gr loads. Don’t need a .308 for 400-600m.


22 posted on 06/13/2018 10:27:03 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w1n1

“Which results in 800 rounds per minute from this gun,”

Quit misstating that statistic. You couldn’t pull the trigger fast enough to fire that many rounds in 1 minute nor could you change magazines fast enough to do so. That stat. is a measure on the time it takes for the action to cycle. 800 is way too fast and would lead to multiple failure to feeds/jams. Action speeds below 600 are preferred. Magazine springs can only feed rounds upward into the action so fast. At 800 the springs can’t keep up.....


23 posted on 06/13/2018 10:28:56 AM PDT by Forty-Niner (The barely bare, berry Bear formily known as Ursus Arctos Horrilibis (or U.A. Californicus))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w1n1

I would like to see a comparison between the AR-10 and the HK-91


25 posted on 06/13/2018 10:30:45 AM PDT by READINABLUESTATE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w1n1

First line stopped me. The ArmaLite 15 ( assuming 223/556) is good to 300 or so?

Hmm. Just the other day at a maor High Power rifle match at 600, the top three were: 200-19x, 20018x, and 200-16x.

The first two were shooting optic equipped match rifles in 6 or 6.5 calibers the #3 guy was using an AR-15 A5 service rifle, with a 1-4x optic, in 223 Wylde, 80 grain bullets.

The X ring at 600 is just over 6” ( 2 MOA) and he kept 16 of 20 in that circle, shooting prone, unsupported with a sling.

Tell me again how far the 15 is good for? An 80 at 2750 retains about 1700 fps at 600, for about 500 ft-lbs, the wounding KE value the Army stands by is 300 ft lbs, So the latest AR15 used in matches can indeed be useful to at least 600 yards, not bad for a 22 huh?

Now, all that said, I would prefer the US military step up to a 6mm/6.8 wildcat and run 105s at 2800 from 18inch SPR barrels- that would improve everything- about to 762x51 level and gaining as range increased (over M80).

Oh, and by the way, some long range competitors use the same rifle with 90 grain bullets ( and 6.5 inch twists) to 1000 and do quite well compared to the rest of the field.


27 posted on 06/13/2018 11:09:00 AM PDT by Manly Warrior (US ARMY (Ret), "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w1n1
10 Calibers - AR-15 Ammo Comparison Video

https://mdws.forumchitchat.com/post/10-calibers-ar-15-ammo-comparison-9311840?pid=1300211958

37 posted on 06/14/2018 6:31:41 AM PDT by Elderberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson