Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet
My $0.02 - we're guys, we're going to look. If we're distracted by the view, that's our problem, our lack of self control not the girl's.

Seriously, I'm a guy, I admit it, I have some very non-politically correct tendencies. I like to look at attractive people and things. It is my self control that keeps me from ogling pretty women.

When you start putting the onus on women to not be overly attractive to men, that's when you're headed towards hijabs and long shapeless smocks. Granted, it would be inappropriate for women to show up in daisy duke shorts and halter tops - unless you're playing Daisy Duke in a movie or play. ;-) The point of contention here I guess is where exactly is "the line" between socially acceptable attire for function (X) and inappropriate dress? At the extremes that's easy to define. The tough part is that gray area near the middle.

103 posted on 05/19/2018 3:37:04 PM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Doing my part to help make America great again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ThunderSleeps

BS. Western society has already been a lot more modest and decent WITHOUT ever being in full hijabs. I even recall recently reading about a Moslem, maybe Osama, who studied in AMERICA in the ‘50s and was so offended by the public dances our society often had back then, where the women were definitely more discreet than the sluttiness now.


108 posted on 05/19/2018 3:49:24 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMVs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson