Social Media Accounts of Mass Killers Should Remain Public, Not Removed

Black & Blonde Media ^ | 2/28/18 | Bob Parks

[impetrio1]

How many times have we had a speculation storm after a mass killer's name is released, his or her social media accounts are quickly removed leaving the general public at the mercy of the reckless speculation (and/or agendas) of the media.

Obviously a person in custody for such criminality would incur the wrath of the social media anonymous-brave, so it would be proper and understandable if the person's comments were disabled and the "friends" of that person were made invisible, but the public would still be able to go back and piece together possible motivation without the faux-intellectual speculations of the media; at times in gross error to the detriment of the innocent.

[ButThreeLeftsDo]

Click The Pic

[G Larry]

Keep in mind, Cruz said he was ‘inspired’ by viewing a documentary on another school shooting.

[Keyhopper]

Maybe if they were vilified enough

[G Larry]

Vilification only works if you’re not a sociopath.

Liberals and the mentally ill have no moral compass.

[fella]

The ability of hackers to go into a page and manipulate it kind of makes me wonder.

[LeoTDB69]

Yes and security video should be made publicly available. The immediate response is to secure all access to information and spoon feed out what they want. (Do archives of their Social sites get wiped also?)

Seems too often it’s just a big CYA effort to make sure they can control the blame.

[Maverick68]

The three questions I have about these "mass killers" the Media have a fetish for:

1. Where they on psychotropic meds?
2. Did they have an addiction to Gaming/Internet?
3. Was there a father in the home?

Very curious as to whether these were common problems with these psychos.