So then if the congregates of the local Mosque somehow pool their money and expertise to create and build a dirty bomb.... no problem, right?
What about nerve gas? Thats a weapon. Are you literally stating that any weapon should be allowed to be owned by private citizens under the Second Amendment? With zero exception? And you see no down side to this?
that is correct.... we MUST have the means to counteract ANY act of aggression on the part of the government..... we have an FBI, CIA, ATF, etc. to investigate and root out the evil in the system... but they must also be kept in check..... henceforth, the second amendment... if they can have it, then so should I...
In the hypothetical world you are portraying, of course I would want and use any and all weapons to preserve life and freedom.
Of course I see a down side to it (risk), but life is risky and this is a Constitutional right. Where do YOU draw the line? What firearms/weapons are you comfortable with the public owning? If you say anything less than what I’ve offered, then you are one of the “sensible gun control crowd”...And don’t give me the “but what about the jihadi/ISIS/local Mosque” nonsense...the same can be said about a handgun, vehicle, rocks, chlorine/ammonia mixtures, etc....where do you want to start restricting? Anyone who sets their mind to it can inflict all kinds of damage if they really want to and work at it.