[COUNTrecount]

Gag worthy article about the Empress's New Racial Clothes

But Obama and Smith share more than a first name. Few designers, especially those with Smith’s mass-market appeal, have been as outspoken in their opposition to Trump as Smith. In November 2017, Smith told Teen Vogue: “What I had felt to be an extraordinary triumph for equality—the election of an African-American president—was my children’s normal.

Gay marriage and LGBTQ equality was their normal. Their generation, I had often thought, is where the real shift in equality and human rights will take place. I had easily assumed their next ultimate role model would be a female president. I was wrong. . . . All the rights I had sadly taken for granted . . . now felt threatened. I had to do something.”

[Cowboy Bob]

Why does Michelle have a tiny head?

[upchuck]

FReeper FrankR nailed it:

[GSWarrior]

Her dress looks like a Yes album cover.

[dainbramaged]

The Bamster’s gigantic left hand has an extra finger, too.

[Steve_Seattle]

Are the other portraits in the gallery that large? Judging by the chairs off to the side, the portraits look about ten feet tall.

[Jane Long]

The comments, at link, require FB (of which I am not a member).

I’d like to ask these sycophants why do they suppose the author of this ‘glowing’ article failed to mention the fact that this Mooch artist is known for painting depicting BLACK women holding the decapitated heads of WHITE women.

Hmmmmm....I wonder why no one at Polutico is discussing that.

[NorthMountain]

While the official portraits of Barack and Michelle Obama unveiled Monday were applauded by the art world

There's a damning indictment of the "art world".

[NorthMountain]

First, the criticism about the lack of resemblance to the former first lady comes as no surprise to those of us familiar with the work of Sherald

Right. She's incompetent, and you all know it. You're just too damned cowardly to say so. Instead, you spew endless torrents of bovine fecal matter, in a failed attempt to sound sophisticated.

[upchuck]

Other questions:

- Why does nobama appear to have an extra finger on his left hand?

- Why does nobama appear to have a sperm on the side of his head?

[Chauncey Gardiner]

The big dress hides any notion of a jock strap or bulging man parts.

[Steve_Seattle]

The good news is that the Obamas will be stuck with these terrible paintings forever, a fitting legacy.

[morphing libertarian]

arms look like elephant trunks. I always thought she should cover her arms.

[butlerweave]

She has Millions of Hungry school children hiding under that dress

[Fightin Whitey]

First time I’ve seen her with her sloppy mouth shut.

The real issue behind this hideous sham is that the artist specialized in pictures of white women having their heads cut off.

Imagine if the color tables were reversed. Sickening.

[bgill]

“same-sex scenes” and “gender fluid”

So, Moo really is Michael with the overly full skirt hiding that fact.

[pugmama]

Does anyone have any information re the 2 dogs in the Obama household. Are they still alive?

[bgill]

After all the bad publicity, those will never hang in the Smithsonian. Other portraits will quietly replace them. So sad. I’d rather have those monstrosities on display for the next generations to see.

[4Liberty]

[4Liberty]

[x]

Secondly, there’s a reason why Obama’s face is the least interesting element here: The dress is as much a window into the former first lady’s identity as her face, and possibly a more accurate one.

Upstaged by a dress? Like Jennifer Aniston and her famous hairdo? Doesn't say much for Michelle.