Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: MNDude

Though the original painting sucks, it does not have the sperm on Obama’s head. Hannity should’ve checked.


9 posted on 02/13/2018 1:01:10 PM PST by libertylover (Kurt Schlicter: "They wonder why they got Trump. They are why they got Trump")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: libertylover

Where have you been all day? There’s been a dozen threads on this. Better go check out the close ups of the Obama sperm and all the other sperm laden portraits the “artist” has done. The guy (both of them) are creeps and sickos. Obama knew exactly who he was hiring and exactly what he’d paint.


16 posted on 02/13/2018 1:19:31 PM PST by bgill (CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: libertylover

Yes it does.
Obama’s New Official Portrait Appears To Feature Sperm...

http://www.newsmediawatchdog.com/single-post/2018/02/13/Bizarre-Former-President-Obamas-New-Official-Portrait-Appears-To-Feature-Sperm-Like-Cell-On-His-Forehead

It is harder to see without lightening the section but once it is seen you can easily see it in the original and on numerous leaves.


24 posted on 02/13/2018 1:53:53 PM PST by JayGalt (Let Trump Be Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson