Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: BroJoeK
Numbers certainly don't support DiogenesLamp's "80%" claim.

You've already conceded the 50%, so i've only got to come up with the other 30%. The link I constantly post to that book "Southern Wealth and Northern Profit" gets me up to 73%. The 80% number I actually got from another Freeper who have told me (and told you too) that he got the numbers from the official record. I don't remember which Freeper it was that said this, but I know him to be among the group that normally argues about this stuff.

So basically, the 1/4 of the Citizens who lived in the South produced 80% of all the European trade.

440 posted on 02/19/2018 1:28:13 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
DiogenesLamp: "So basically, the 1/4 of the Citizens who lived in the South produced 80% of all the European trade."

But regardless of how often you post that here, it's still fake news.
The real facts can be found here:

  1. 1860 Southern Exports = $229 million = 61%
  2. 1860 Northern Exports = $26 million = 7%
  3. 1860 Western Exports = $61 million = 16%
  4. 1860 Gold & Silver = $57 million = 16%

  5. 1860 Total US Exports = $373 million = 100%

But the numbers from 1861 tell us that not all those "Southern exports" actually came from the South.
We see that cotton certainly did, and those exports fell 80%.
However, tobacco exports fell only 15% thus demonstrating they were not truly from "the South" at all.

You need to wrap your mind around the facts, FRiend.


492 posted on 02/20/2018 6:40:19 AM PST by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 440 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson