To: Nifster
You could be right, but this decision wasn’t Amazon’s. From the article:
“This new policy was started prior to the chain’s recent purchase by amazon.”
6 posted on
01/19/2018 6:22:52 AM PST by
MV=PY
(The Magic Question: Who's paying for it?)
To: MV=PY
You could be right, but this decision wasn’t Amazon’s. From the article: “This new policy was started prior to the chain’s recent purchase by amazon.”Prior to the bid or the closing of the purchase? Because once a friendly bid is made, management will go to great lengths to make the bidder happy.
22 posted on
01/19/2018 6:30:55 AM PST by
Zhang Fei
(Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
To: MV=PY
You could be right, but this decision wasn’t Amazon’s. From the article:
“This new policy was started prior to the chain’s recent purchase by amazon.”
...
Facts are stubborn things.
45 posted on
01/19/2018 6:55:34 AM PST by
Moonman62
(Make America Great Again!)
To: MV=PY
But wouldn’t Amazon have known that and decide to either drop or keep the policy?
81 posted on
01/19/2018 7:56:22 AM PST by
lastchance
(Credo.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson