Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: ctdonath2
Agreed. The “created in motion” theory makes God out as a liar, presenting false evidence.

You're assuming God was wearing an engineer hat.

Dorothy Sayers had a very interesting piece on this based on her experience as a novelist. She pointed out that the characters had events in their lives which were never explicitly detailed in the novels, even if they were discussed by the characters during a novel.

The author, far from being misleading by doing so, was serving a higher artistic purpose, since the novels had fixed beginning and end, but the characters (were they real) would have had a LOT of their life completely outside of the bounds of the novel.

The characters' behaviour would have to be consistent with their lives and experiences outside of the novel, even if those items never "existed" within the fictional world bounded by the novel.

56 posted on 12/02/2017 7:56:06 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: grey_whiskers

That’s kinda the point of “Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead”, noting the absurdity thereof.

The 10,000 year claim is based on a highly debatable interpretation of a few lines of Scripture given to a goat herder.

The heavens declare a much bigger & older space than man’s limited interpretation of a text concludes. When great contortions of understanding reality are required to unify with an unsure interpretation of Scripture, it’s usually the interpretation that’s got it wrong.


58 posted on 12/02/2017 8:04:13 PM PST by ctdonath2 (It's not "white privilege", it's "Puritan work ethic". Behavior begets consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson