To: Sir Napsalot
I’d like a return to “you have to own real estate to vote”. Nothing fancy. Even a half acre in Appalachia will do.
To: robroys woman
I will either be voting or shooting.The SJW types can decide or me which it will be.
9 posted on
08/03/2017 6:23:38 AM PDT by
Farmer Dean
(168 grains of instant conflict resolution)
To: robroys woman
Id like a return to you have to own real estate to vote. Nothing fancy. Even a half acre in Appalachia will do.Your proposal would create a progressive real estate scheme selling 1 square foot lots for $1000 each.
To: robroys woman
Or, you have to pay taxes!
21 posted on
08/03/2017 6:52:10 AM PDT by
goodnesswins
(Say hello to President Trump)
To: robroys woman
“Id like a return to you have to own real estate to vote. “
—
Nonsense-———some of the most patriotic people I know never owned property,andthat includes my mother.
.
31 posted on
08/03/2017 7:55:03 AM PDT by
Mears
To: robroys woman
I think it is way past time that we turned the corner from endlessly seeking to increase the suffrage, to terminating suffrage for those with clear conflicts of interest. It grows more critical by the day!
Threat To Liberty
33 posted on
08/03/2017 7:58:30 AM PDT by
Ohioan
To: robroys woman
Id like a return to you have to own real estate to vote. Nothing fancy. Even a half acre in Appalachia will do. People who own real estate have a vested interest in seeing their community prosper. If the community doesn't prosper, the value of their holdings go down.
Meanwhile, renters can just move elsewhere after they have done damage to their current community.
40 posted on
08/03/2017 8:54:17 AM PDT by
PapaBear3625
(Big governent is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson