Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

PORT CANAVERAL is in Brevard County, FL! Remember this:

http://theamericanreport.org/2016/09/22/obama-clinton-handed-port-canaveral-to-brother-of-saddam-husseins-nuclear-bomb-mastermind/

I sold my house in FL near there, and believe me, there are issues behind the scenes that require arming yourself! I spent two months there last year, and glad to be home! Orlando is cesspool of crime! It was less than 40 miles away.


5 posted on 06/11/2017 4:54:16 PM PDT by Ambrosia ('If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck...., unless it's an imposter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ambrosia; Tilted Irish Kilt

Did you ever read *One Second After*?

It’s a fiction about an EMP attack and the breakdown of society that ensues.

Now, I’m not going to get into how feasible the scenario of the EMP attack could be, but the breakdown of society after a huge disaster is more than feasible and VERY alarming.

It’s a fascinating and heartbreaking book. I cried at the end and I am not much of a crier.

But it’s great food for thought and this sheriff is right on about the need to be able to defend ourselves, and IMO, especially if you live near a large city.


37 posted on 06/11/2017 9:20:50 PM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Ambrosia

Gotta love this guy! We owned property in Brevard County for a few years. Sorry now that we sold out! This sheriff is definitely NOT a “sellout” to the current PC insanity!

For any who might not like his message, allow me to acquaint you with just one court decision of several that scream that your immediate safety is YOUR SOLE responsibility.

Click this link to see the entire story (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia) but here’s the exact bottom line language of the decision in “Warren V. District of Columbia”:

“”[t]he duty to provide public services is owed to the public at large, and, absent a special relationship between the police and an individual, no specific legal duty exists”. The Court thus adopted the trial court’s determination that no special relationship existed between the police and appellants, and therefore no specific legal duty existed between the police and the appellants.”


55 posted on 06/12/2017 2:49:46 PM PDT by Dick Bachert (America dodged a bullet. But remember that millions of morons are STILL OUT THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson