Posted on 05/30/2017 10:26:25 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
What I heard on Saturday night.
I spoke at an event last Saturday for Michael McNeely, who is a candidate to be chairman of the Georgia Republican Party. The election by party delegates will be held on June 3 in Augusta.
This election has national significance in that the Georgia Republican Party chairman (or chairwoman) is one of the three Georgia representatives on the Board of the Republican National Committee.
“No, not a strawman.
Youre really broken up over this.”
Wrong. I’m laughing. This is fun.
“Were not really that interested in driving OUR traffic to YOUR blog.
NOT AN EXCERPT
I did respond to that. Apparently you are so high on rabbit hole mushrooms you have missed it!
Oh, so you’re TROLLING.
How quaint.
Your “response” wasn’t.
Try again.
“So it IS stolen content passed off as own content.”
This is the dumbest comment so far. Sean attributes every excerpt to the author. He does not act like the content is his own. That is very plain to see for anyone not stuck deep down a dark rabbit hole eating mushrooms.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3556516/replies?c=21
http://freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3556516/replies?c=30
Nope.
Perhaps the bot isn't running because its owner is too busy having a meltdown on this thread?
Possible.
Actually he posted just a few minutes ago.
It didn’t last long -
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3556810/posts
Ack.
Bot is brokededs.
Yes I’m trolling and said so. Laz was too.
What I said about Canada Free Press and the other sites excerpted is still true. And probably why Sean hasn’t been zotted in spite of 13 years of bitching, whining and tattling. Management probably agrees there really is no difference between any of the news sites supported by ads that get excerpted here on FR hundreds of times a day. If they zotted Canada Free press they would have to zot all the others I listed for the same reason. The news sites I listed are not “blogs” like the ones referred to in the guidelines.
celebrityinsider.org
history.com
www.wnd.com
townhall.com
tmz.com
lifezette.com
breitbart.com
cnsnews.com
biggeekdad.com
independentsentinel.com
legalinsurrection.com
freebeacon.com
thegatewaypundit.com
Wow you guys are wound up so tight you can think rationally.
I never thought it would go this far.
And you were directed to take it up with the site owner as raging at and trolling us is impotence.
You still won’t do it.
You will not ask the site owner for clarification.
You will only snark and troll.
I told you, I have all day.
Read 89.
There’s a reason why Canada Free Press hasn’t been zotted in 13 years.
People, come on out of the rabbit hole!
Poor bot...
Sean_Anthony's owner probably wanted to counter my post - but the bot got blowed-up...
“And you were directed to take it up with the site owner”
I did, in post 62.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3556521/posts?page=62#62
No, you didn’t.
You said nothing of substance there about your issue.
You didn’t ask your supposed question on what is or isn’t a blog.
Try again.
Jim can read my posts and see all he needs to see.
It is best to state directly.
And it is obvious you won’t do that.
Because you do not really want an answer.
Articles have been posted from Canada Free Press for many years. The last two days obviously isn’t the first management has heard about them. This indicates articles from Canada Free Press don’t violate the guidelines and all of you are chasing a rabbit deep down it’s hole.
Articles have been posted from Canada Free Press for many years. The last two days obviously isn’t the first management has heard about them. This indicates articles from Canada Free Press don’t violate the guidelines and all of you are chasing a rabbit deep down its hole.
Yes, and it has been an issue mentioned for awhile.
Ask humblegunner about blog pimps, especially the one of this thread.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.