1) The Robert Laurie authored article from hermancain.com was posted on CFP in a manner that implies that CFP was the original source. You did note how far down the page you had to go before you found out that it was sourced from Herman Cain's site didn't you?
2) The Sean Anthony dude posted the article as an FR post with a link to the CFP rather than to the originating page. Now if Judi McLeod or any of the CFP staff write an article then linking to CFP is legit. Linking, as this Anthony dude invariably does, to an article on CFP sourced from another website is at least dishonest and does create that impression that he (this Anthony dude) is worthy of the appellation of blogpimp. You seem offended by that fact. Or intentionally ignoring it.
3) The dishonesty is not in the attribution of authorship (which you managed to extract from my wording though I never stated or implied such) it is in the misattribution of source (which I did mention) for the apparent gain of bloghits. And we know that dishonesty is a quagmire.
4) I note that you quickly appropriate the manner and language of the left by characterizing points that run contrary to your narrative as lies (and then misinterpreting what was stated thus avoiding refutation of those points) and incredibly stupid. I do not recall returning that favor in kind. If that is the manner in which you wish to be addressed I am capable of doing so. I was just brought up better and chose not to stoop to the non-standards of the left.
5) Whether or not you and this Anthony dude are alter egos, acquaintances, distant relatives, or complete strangers the fact remains that you are here running interference for him while having suspiciously close sign up dates which at least reeks of strange coincidence and begs the question be raised - which it was. And you're being extremely defensive about it. Which is interesting in itself.
6) Any and all pretense you maintained of objectivity was completely invalidated by your last paragraph where you trotted into the field of Trump - Russia, a subject that was never a part of this entire thread and a comparison that has been made by no other. Such leaps of logical incongruity are more fitting of a denizen of the DUmp..
1) False, and opinion. It’s obvious Robert Laurie is the originator.
2)Sean posted it to FR and attributed it to Robert Laurie who is the original author.
3)Huge stretch driven by unhinged emotional dishonest speculation. And that’s your problem, I’m not the one pushing an imaginary agenda here.
4) I note how quickly you appropriate the manner and language of the elitists in the MSM attacking with all sorts of vacuous accusations and fantasies straight out of your imagination. You don’t know, you are guessing. Same as the elitist left with Trump/Russia.
5) If Sean and I are the same person then Sean donates to FR because I do. Which probably is the reason he hasn’t been zotted in 13 years. LOL!
6) Trump Russia comparison is valid, because the accusations are just as flimsy and imaginary. Your leaps of logical incongruity are more fitting of a denizen of the DUmp.