I went back and read Number's posting history. While I don't necessarily agree with all the points made throughout, they're all well-reasoned and researched posts. I don't think he/she is either a troll or a bot.
Please don't succumb to the growing trend on here of making knee-jerk reactionary posts when someone casts doubt on a premise.
The irony here is: it's exactly what Bill Nye is doing in the interview.
I certainly reacted to the notion that skeptics are on the secret payroll of Big Oil.
I also believe that geologists, physicists, et al have a perfect right to speak publicly on matters of physical science.
If CAGW climatology is more than a charlatan’s guild, then let it be scientifically transparent, as all other serious disciplines are. Open the data!
Computer models? Paugh!
American-style Lysenkoism is still bullsh*t.