/// That is because women are hypocritical about sexual strategies, inherently assuming theirs is totally moral and acceptable and guys strategies are just awful and base and primal. Theirs is the same but they don’t have a problem with theirs also being awful and base and primal. ///
The sexual strategy thing is a problem, because women often ignore younger guys or beta provider types when they are younger. Women have higher sexual-market-value (SMV) when they are younger and it declines with age.
Its a timing problem.
Men’s SMV tends to increase with age (which often correlates to wealth). So most women get to “party” at an earlier age than men, pissing off a lot of younger men who are passed over. Then when those younger men are older, it becomes THEIR turn to party with younger women.
Why should older men be expected to take in the age group of women who ignored them when they were younger? Or for that matter help raise some other guy’s kid conceived with some alpha dude back when she was riding the **** carousel?
Not my job.
You have read the books I have been reading. :)
A woman’s best long term strategy would be to marry in her early 20’s to the best-quality man she could nail down. At 21 she has the widest selection of guys willing to marry her, and she is at her peak desirability. At 30, she is mostly going to get leftovers.