I’ve got a lot of real life happening these days so I don’t remember everything I see on the world scene. Was it Mike Flynn who reported that the intel was being altered by Rice?
Looks like it was Flynn and a bunch of others who blew the whistle on intel being altered and/or hidden, with Clapper being the one who refused to let CENTCOM see what was collected from the Bin Laden raid.
So now Cernovich’s report is that the person on Trump’s team who has Susan Rice’s position is now doing the same thing to Trump as Rice did for Obama. The guy who was politically ousted by Susan Rice unmasking surveillance reports may be Cernovich’s source, and he probably has connections with the same people who were frustrated by the politicization of military defense under Obama.
I don’t know what to think about Cernovich, but given that the whole system has a record of doing this crap which puts the nation at risk, I think the issue needs to be seriously checked out.
And especially since there are serious questions about the Islamist terrorist who posted the videos of the “gas attack” (at least one of which shows a guy who is laughing until he sees that the camera is on him and then starts acting sad/hurt), since Assad wasn’t supposed to have WMD’s any more, since there was no good reason for Assad to use a chemical attack, since we have the emails where Hillary discussed giving the “rebels” chemical weapons to frame Assad once before, since Benghazi was used to funnel Ghadaffi’s weapons to the “rebels”, and since people on-site allegedly said that the kids in the videos had been kidnapped by ISIS.
There are a lot of reasons to suspect that this was a false flag. Yet Trump acted quickly because he thought it was certain that Assad had used the gas - based on what he was told.
All things considered, I think there are enough questions/discrepancies that this should be checked out.