Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

March For Life brings out the loonies on Twitter
Kirchhoff's Law | 1-27-17 | Mary Kirchhoff

Posted on 01/27/2017 2:44:11 PM PST by InHisService

Today I got up and went on my computer with my coffee, as I usually do. But today was a special day; the 2017 annual March For Life. To be truthful, even though I am pro-life, I haven’t really paid much attention to it in previous years.

Now that Trump is president, and I am a supporter, I have been very active on Twitter and Facebook. The fact that we have a pro-life president and vice president is totally inspiring. Women like myself who believe life begins at conception feel hope again.

Naturally, I went on Twitter right away today to see the comments about today’s march. I compiled several of the pro-abortion tweets. (I do not call it pro-choice because that is a lame way of saying you are okay with aborting a baby. It’s not about a woman’s choice, it is about life and death.)

So, here’s a few of the pro-abortion folks’ tweets, and my reply to them.

CenterforReproRightsVerified account ‏@ReproRights

Pence says he shows "respect for the dignity and worth of every person." What about women? #MarchForLife #MarchOfLies

To that I say, what about future women that are in the womb right now? Those female babies are eventually going to become women. But the pro-death crowd doesn’t want to give that baby a right. They are obsessed with the murder of innocents.

Some of the shirts worn at the #WomensMarch were downright disturbing. My favorite one to be disgusted by? I <3 Abortion. Seriously? You LOVE abortion? What kind of mentality is that?

Christopher Zullo @ChrisJZullo

#MarchForLife you really want to stop abortions? Providing free and reliable birth control would prevent 75% of them. Retweet this fact now

What ever happened to individual responsibility? Why should my tax dollars – indeed anyone’s tax dollars – support your sex life? Especially when your sex life involves killing an unborn child? This tweeter claims 75% of abortions would end if the government provided free, reliable (read – abortion) – birth control. And then wants you to “retweet this fact now.” Where’d he get his 75% number? Just a very uneducated, fictitious guess, I suppose. Oh, he’s also a man so he really doesn’t know a thing about it. Here’s a thought – don’t have unprotected sex with multiple partners. Don’t have unprotected sex with one, or any partners. If you can’t have sex that prevents pregnancy, don’t have sex. It’s really not that difficult.

Next we have this tweet:

Steven Rivera ‏@StevenRivera86 4h4 hours ago

Where was this #MarchForLife when Republican Gov Snyder poisoned the waters in Flint, Michigan leaving hundreds of kids with led poison?

You have to love the way pro-abortion people like to throw in something totally unrelated to what the #MarchforLife is about, which is protecting the rights of the unborn. Here’s an analogy: If there’s a march for say, breast cancer awareness, they are marching for a cure, to help women specifically with that issue: breast cancer. It isn’t about global warming, or poison in the waters of Flint Michigan. The #MarchForLife is about saving the lives of the unborn, period.

I would also say to Steven: What about your beloved #MarchforWomen? Did they give a hoot about poisoned waters? No. Because they were marching for “Women’s Rights”, a euphemism for abortion. So, I won’t ask if the #MarchForWomen was concerned about women in other countries being forced into marriage at the age of nine, women who suffer in relationships where there is violence, women dying in large number from drug overdoses, or a host of other women’s issues. Because I know they are not concerned about those matters, they are concerned only about the right to kill an unborn baby.

Same thing here in this tweet:

Humanity vs Trump @Humans_vs_Trump

And by #MarchForLife I assume they mean ending the death penalty, health care for all, gun control, & environmental protection. RT=agree

When a pro-life march takes place, liberals have this crazy way of lumping all of humanities problems onto those marchers, and expecting every problem out there to be marched for in a March for Life. Although the nutcases wearing vagina suits said they were marching for women (not this one, or millions of others) the whole #MarchForWomen spectacle was a pussy-hat wearing, foul mouthed, vulgar affair with people like Madonna threatening to blow up the White House, and women clad in shirts with hearts proclaiming, I <3 abortion.

Charles Clymer @cmclymer

Let's be clear: this is not a march for life. This is a march to control women's sexuality. Full stop. #MarchForLife

I didn’t truly understand this statement, so I deferred to the Dictionary.

sexuality noun 1. sexual character; possession of the structural and functional traits of sex. 2. recognition of or emphasis upon sexual matters. 3. involvement in sexual activity. 4. an organism's preparedness for engaging in sexual activity.

I have to admit: I’m still not getting it. Is he saying the women in this march are trying to tell others to stop having sex? It’s interesting that men posted the most ridiculous tweets I came upon. They’ve been brainwashed by the militant faction of the pro-abortion crowd.

And finally, this tweet from NARAL pro-choice America:

95% of women do not regret having an abortion, and feel it was the best decision for them. #MarchOfLies

Ninety-five percent, ha? Note the hashtag #MarchOfLies. That’s trending today, though I’m not sure what the March for Life folks are lying about. The article referred to is in the extremely left leaning Huffington Post and it quotes a “study” published in PLOS ONE. The study was conducted by the University of California, San Francisco.

Here’s a quote from an “unbiased” researcher in this study:

“There’s a perception in the public, and in the general discourse about abortion, that abortion is somehow emotionally harmful for women,” Study researcher Dr. Corinne Rocca, an epidemiologist, told The Huffington Post. “Or that we need to protect women from the abortions that they choose to have.”

Link to the Huff Post story:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/no-women-do-not-regret-getting-abortions_us_55a41166e4b0b8145f734040

There have been countless other studies done that indicate many women suffer greatly after having an abortion. You want to talk about lies? Ninety-five percent of women being “okay” and “just fine” and not having any regrets about their abortion is a whopper of a lie.

We know we can trust this study because it was researched by a pro-abortionist, right? NARAL pro-choice America proudly uses this 95% quote in a meme to promote the lie and further misinform women that abortion is not, and will not be mentally, physically, or emotionally damaging to them.

I truly hope Roe v. Wade will be overturned. Millions of couples out there that cannot have children would be waiting with open arms to adopt the babies that are unplanned or unwanted. And that is a win for humanity.


TOPICS: Government; Health/Medicine; Politics; Religion
KEYWORDS: abortion; marchforlife; prolife
Sorry for my lack of Html skills. My blog is currently down.
1 posted on 01/27/2017 2:44:11 PM PST by InHisService
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: InHisService

Hate filled, racist, trash who lack any self respect. No decency, no conscience, no morals and no courage.

Make no mistake, these women don’t care about other women. They are the most intolerant hateful group who are jealous of the women who are pro-life.


2 posted on 01/27/2017 2:48:41 PM PST by milford421
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: milford421

Couldn’t agree more!


3 posted on 01/27/2017 2:49:56 PM PST by InHisService
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: InHisService

...“There’s a perception in the public, and in the general discourse about abortion, that abortion is somehow emotionally harmful for women,...” Study researcher Dr. Corinne Rocca, an epidemiologist, told The Huffington Post...

“Or that we need to protect women from the abortions that they choose to have.”

HA! an epidemiologist?! Ridiculous! They could NOT find an OB-GYN/Psychologist/Psychiatrist/therapist/counsellor to spew that stupid horsesh!t - they rely on the expertise of an epidemiologist??

That was the funniest, and saddest post today...


4 posted on 01/27/2017 3:16:28 PM PST by heterosupremacist (views/opinions of the author posted do Not necessarily reflect the views/opinion(s) of the poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InHisService
It’s not about a woman’s choice, it is about life and death.

Exactly...I have been saying that for years...the opposite of life is DEATH, not 'choice'.

5 posted on 01/27/2017 3:18:45 PM PST by who knows what evil? (Yehovah saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InHisService
There was some great stuff on twitter today for #MarchForLife
Here's a couple I saw:

Video from Chili RightToLife (start at 1:30) The Voice of the Heart

6 posted on 01/27/2017 3:22:05 PM PST by libertarian27 (FR Cookbooks - On Profile Page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: heterosupremacist

This “study” is a joke.


7 posted on 01/27/2017 3:22:29 PM PST by InHisService
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: who knows what evil?

Choice,that magical word that makes tearing a baby’s limbs off and crushing their head acceptable.


8 posted on 01/27/2017 3:24:05 PM PST by InHisService
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: InHisService

Well, at least they noticed there was a march.

I’m not sure most of the media did the same.


9 posted on 01/27/2017 4:05:27 PM PST by SaxxonWoods (Ride To The Sound Of The Guns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InHisService

Why aren’t abortion lovers pushing to change the laws that charge a double murder when a pregnant woman is murdered?


10 posted on 01/27/2017 4:08:22 PM PST by SaxxonWoods (Ride To The Sound Of The Guns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson