Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Citing Threats Of Trump, SEIU To Slash Budget 30 Percent
WBUR-FM ^ | December 30, 2016 | Simón Rios

Posted on 12/30/2016 8:23:57 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

The Service Employees International Union (SEIU) — the second largest union operating in Massachusetts, with some 87,000 members in the state — is slashing its roughly $300 million national operating budget by 30 percent, citing the "threats" posed to organized labor by President-elect Trump.

SEIU's international president told staff earlier this month that because the far right will control all three branches of the federal government, workers will face serious threats to their ability to join unions.

SEIU local 32BJ is fighting for a $15 minimum wage and to unionize 1,500 workers at Logan Airport. 32BJ's Roxana Rivera said it’s still too early to know the local effects of the budget cuts. But she does not expect organizing to diminish.

"SEIU and the locals that are under the umbrella of SEIU that carry out the organizing plans, from many years ago we've made organizing a priority," Rivera said.

The SEIU's 30 percent budget reduction will be complete by 2018, with a 10 percent reduction going into effect Jan. 1. The union would not say what exactly will be cut, though the local budgets are not tied to the national budget.

Organized labor is on high alert for coming judicial appointments by Donald Trump. They include more than 100 federal judgeships and a Supreme Court position. And a conservative Supreme Court could decide that non-union workers covered by union contracts can opt out of paying fees that cover the cost of contract negotiations.

Massachusetts AFL-CIO President Steven Tolman said the need to cut could spread to other unions, including his own.

"We always look very closely at the budgets, and if our affiliates are cutting back, it's a sign that the whole industry is going to have to tighten up their belts and be more responsible financially," he said.

But Tolman also said the need for unions will increase.

"Our mission in the fights that we take on, are certainly not going to diminish, in fact they're going to augment very rapidly when the new administration is in place."

Some experts feel the coming political Climate will demand more political Action from unions — and less organizing. Clark University industrial relations professor Gary Chaison said the SEIU budget cuts indicate that's what's happening. But he said the predominance of pro-labor Democrats in the state legislature make Massachusetts unique.

“The battles to be fought in Massachusetts are different than in other states — but nothing should be taken for granted," Chaison said. "There may have a favorable political climate, but they should allocate funds to make sure that the climate always stays favorable."

Barbara Madeloni heads the Massachusetts Teachers Association, the state's largest union at 110,000 members. Madeloni said the best defense against Trump is to expand grassroots organizing. She cites the successful "No on 2" campaign, which beat back efforts in the November elections to expand charter schools in the state.

"The question of political power will follow deep organizing," Madeloni said. "That's what we discovered in No on 2 ... the power of people working in coalitions for public education."

Union membership has seen a decline in recent decades, down nearly 50 percent since 1983, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.. The rate of union membership is slightly higher in Massachusetts, where about 14 percent of the workforce — or 402,000 workers — belonged to unions in 2015.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Politics
KEYWORDS: california; fresno; massachusetts; seiu; seiubudget; trump; unions; winning
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
Winning.
1 posted on 12/30/2016 8:23:57 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Bring on the Muttley gif


2 posted on 12/30/2016 8:25:22 AM PST by BigEdLB (To Dimwitocrats: We won. You lost. Get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

More likely:

They’re losing all their slush fund money from the Obama admin.


3 posted on 12/30/2016 8:26:27 AM PST by JPJones (George Washington's Tariffs were Patriotic. Build a Wall and Build a Wall of tariffs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Everyday is a winner! It will soon be impossible to find room for all the 1st place trophy’s!


4 posted on 12/30/2016 8:26:42 AM PST by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Probably cutting benefits to workers - and NOT fat salaries to union execs.


5 posted on 12/30/2016 8:28:48 AM PST by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The “far right” will be controlling all three branches???!!!


6 posted on 12/30/2016 8:29:22 AM PST by Walrus (2 Thessalonians 3, 10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JPJones

You can bet the cuts won’t come from salaries and perks of union leaders. They may fire a secretary here and there, tho.


7 posted on 12/30/2016 8:29:57 AM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Translation: we’re losing our federal tax money subsides that Obama and Cabal were giving us

ps:
Only 70 percent more budget cut to go and this SUPER-CORRUPT union will be OOB!


8 posted on 12/30/2016 8:31:49 AM PST by faithhopecharity ("Politicans are not born, they're excreted." -- Marcus Tillius Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

That’s so terrible for these freeloaders. Boohoo, sniff, sniff. There’s a special level of Hell reserved for SEIU members.


9 posted on 12/30/2016 8:31:52 AM PST by MasterGunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: faithhopecharity

Interesting to see. I wondered why they would cite the perceived threat of Trump as a reason to cut spending and cut back their activities. Wouldn’t a perceived unfriendly president cause them to redouble their efforts to oppose Trump????


10 posted on 12/30/2016 8:36:25 AM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

As much as I’d like to believe this, I think its some type of scam. Maybe they’re channeling the money into political activities or something else. No union is going to give up money —they’ll fight for every penny even if it means killing their membership to get it.


11 posted on 12/30/2016 8:36:50 AM PST by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This is what draining the swamp means, cutting off the ruling class’s money supply. The left won’t be able to respond at a national level if we cut their funding. And we shouldn’t rely just on Trump. All 31 governors need to go Scott Walker at the same time. The left will have to pick their battles.


12 posted on 12/30/2016 8:38:57 AM PST by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Awesome!


13 posted on 12/30/2016 8:39:31 AM PST by veracious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Are they going to slash dues as well?


14 posted on 12/30/2016 8:45:13 AM PST by Cowgirl of Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Just rescind JFK's executive order allowing civil service unions and maybe our employees will start working for us instead of the unions.
15 posted on 12/30/2016 8:56:29 AM PST by oldbrowser (Obama begat Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Most SEIU people I've seen need to slash at least 30% of their weight.

16 posted on 12/30/2016 8:59:09 AM PST by BookmanTheJanitor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Royal Flush winning ;-)


17 posted on 12/30/2016 9:01:04 AM PST by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Wait! What? They counter a threat to their organization by REDUCING their budget? Wouldn’t you normally INCREASE your budget to counter a threat? Oh, yeah. Right. They’re not reducing their budget at all because of this “threat”; they’re real “threat” is massive loss of membership and slush fund money of one sort or another.


18 posted on 12/30/2016 9:06:25 AM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“workers will face serious threats to their ability to join unions.”

We’ll lose our pseudo-protection racket scam and be unable to strongarm dues out of workers so we can sit on ass and push forward our commie bs.


19 posted on 12/30/2016 9:08:20 AM PST by wheresmyusa (FTUN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

They should just have a coin with Trump’s profile on one side and Putin’s on the other.

Then the Liberals could toss that coin to determine who to blame for their various hand-wringing issues.


20 posted on 12/30/2016 9:10:55 AM PST by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson