"Fact checkers" WaPo: "sure" no illegals voted...

[FreedomUS]

WaPo the always warrior with a poisonous passion in its OBSESSIVE anti Trump-ism, is 100% sure Trump's charge of illegal votes is 'false.'

"Donald Trump’s bogus claim that millions of people voted illegally for Hillary Clinton" - Washington Post Nov-27-2016.

It's one thing to call it: unproven, another thing to be so certain it's not true with no evidence to base it upon.

However, what is so certain is that in 2013:

"Supreme Court strikes down Arizona law requiring proof of citizenship to vote - U.S." NBC - Jun 17, 2013 - The Supreme Court on Monday struck down an Arizona law that requires ... requirement for would-be voters to show proof of U.S. citizenship. .... http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06

---

I remember how CNN demonized Guiliani for questioning Hillary's health. Also CNN anchor was so sure that the rumours are completely false, she called it ' "conspiracy theories"... The likes of "birtherim" ' And asked if we should call it "health-ism". And so was the headline in TheAtlantic: "Questions About Hillary's Health: The Birtherism of 2016 - The Atlantic - Aug 22, 2016 [ http://www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/496847/ ]

Then of course came the 9/11 Clip of Hillary falling....

[WKUHilltopper]

And I’m sure WaPo is nothing more than a treasonous collective of subversive commies. FUWaPo

[az_gila]

From what I can see, many states, including CA, allow you to vote if you are simply a resident.

The theory is if you are at least a resident, you can vote on local issues, but not federal ones, like the prez.

Whether you agree w/that or not is besides the point I’m making.

As far as I can tell, an illegal who is a resident that goes to vote does NOT get a ballot different from anyone else. There will still be a check box for prez.

There is also NO personally identifiable info on the ballot.

So if an illegal who is resident votes, they are able to vote for prez because they get the same ballot as everyone else, and it gets counted because there’s no way to tell from the ballot that the person was only allowed to vote on local stuff.

---

Interestingly, if CA actually used their drivers licenses for ID, then “undocumented” residents can be identified... but think if the (D) vote loss.../S

[fruser1]

True, but would they get a different ballot?

Is their ballot marked after the fact to indicate, as simply a resident, they can’t vote federal items?

[oldtech]

Is this Az. Supreme Court or U.S. Supreme Court?

[hal ogen]

Liars...idiots. Who believes their continuous crapola? Pathetic losers.

[FreedomUS]

AZ court, I believe.

[FreedomUS]

At this instance, CNN is worse...

BostonGlobe: “Trump claims with no evidence”
https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2016/11/27/donald-trump-says-without-illegal-votes-won-popular-vote-too/B6KClZcV7x2whk4Jjn6aZP/story.html

CNN: “Trump falsely claims”
http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/27/politics/donald-trump-voter-fraud-popular-vote/

[FreedomUS]

It’s US Supreme Court. Not the local (AZ) court.

[Sam Gamgee]

Truly a “1984” technique. War is peace and all that. They think they can just label themselves “fact checkers” to turn their opinions, voila, into facts.

[FreedomUS]

CNN’s amanpour calles the MSM “fact based media”. LOL.