Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: drewh

There is absolutely no reason to even start to believe that a candidate that received only 30,000 votes, 1.1% of the take, and won not one county when the winner received over 1,400,000 votes, and the second place finisher took 17 counties, can possibly win the election in that state. So, if they want to recount the state, then the only votes that are required to be counted to determine if Stein won, would be hers and Trumps unless they find when counting that some of someone else’s were Stein’s. Hilary didn’t ask for a recount, so her votes don’t need counting if they are for her. So. the only votes of hers that mean anything are the ones that should have been counted for Stein as Hilary has no horse in this race.

red


59 posted on 11/25/2016 6:19:50 PM PST by Redwood71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Redwood71

This is all about getting votes for Hillary not Jill. Hillary can claim she has nothing to do with this and Jill takes the fall.

It gives me a migraine to think these evil people keep pushing the envelope.


63 posted on 11/25/2016 6:22:08 PM PST by hsmomx3 (Love my Steelers!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: Redwood71
That makes perfect sense, but the legislators who wrote the state laws may not have ever considered that a candidate might want a recount in order to win the election for a different candidate. Just a guess.

Wisconsin has already agreed to a recount, so it looks like they disagree with you.

78 posted on 11/25/2016 6:32:42 PM PST by TChad (Propagandists should not be treated like journalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson