Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: BroJoeK
As for why, anybody can speculate, but the fact remains Canadians experienced nothing like the "train of abuses and usurpations" inflicted on 13 colonies.

So we are intended to believe that all British acts and edicts had a clause "except for the Canadians" in them?

And you wonder why you aren't taken seriously.

455 posted on 12/05/2016 10:50:37 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 453 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
DiogenesLamp: "So we are intended to believe that all British acts and edicts had a clause 'except for the Canadians' in them?
And you wonder why you aren't taken seriously."

Nobody takes DiogenesLamp seriously, but regardless, your prattling should still be answered.

So the answer is: of course they did.
And the burden of proof is on DiogenesLamp to demonstrate how many, if any, of the "long train of abuses and usurpations" listed in the Declaration of Independence were also visited on Canada.
To my knowledge, none were.

479 posted on 12/05/2016 4:38:01 PM PST by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 455 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson