Posted on 10/15/2016 4:32:38 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Hacked emails released in daily dispatches this past week by the WikiLeaks group exposed the inner workings of Hillary Clinton’s campaign leading up to her 2015 announcement that she would seek the presidency, and through this year’s primary.
The thousands of emails were hacked from the accounts of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta.
U.S. intelligence officials have blamed the Russian government for a series of breaches intended to influence the presidential election. The Russians deny involvement....
(Excerpt) Read more at yahoo.com ...
Somewhat selective in their choice of emails to report on.
What about the ones that dealt with campaign collusion with an AP reporter?
They left out a bunch of stuff...looks like they are now being forced to at least mention WikiLeaks emails.
This is a calm fact-based article about a political candidate—exactly the opposite of the reporting about Donald Trump.
It was designed to put the reader to sleep though they would lose interest!
Too bad there is no comment section.....
I dont t care who hacked their emails
It’s what’s in them that matters.
When a state department flunkie discusses how much Algeria has to,pay the Clinton Foundation to be removed from the terror sponsor list, then wth are we even running this woman for president? Just on that issue alone we see the future of the USA under her regime .... Everything will be for sale. Everything.
Haven’t been there much lately, but as recent as a couple months ago, Democrats and their lemmings were outnumbered 2-1 in the comment section.
I just popped in on a couple of recent Trump articles there and it’s now about 25-1 PRO Democrat/Hillary.
Trolls are coming out of the woodwork over at American Thinker these days too. They show up on the weekends when the moderation is lax.
I wish they’d hack Paul Ryan’s email.
But, the email they’re hacking are all private servers. Apparently they can’t hack dot gov.
Personally, I believe the NSA can find the “hacker” anytime they want. Therefore, I believe it’s a “leaker” as opposed to a hacker. Some media reports refer to “leaked” emails. Maybe Hillary threw an ashtray at the wrong person and they’ve become vengeful.
-——When a state department flunkie discusses how much Algeria has to,pay the Clinton Foundation to be removed from the terror sponsor list,——
Was this from Wikileaks?
Seth Rich leaked them...and then they killed him and blamed the Russians.
Look, Squirrel!
bttt
Silverleaf,
Where did you see this?
“..When a state department flunkie discusses how much Algeria has to,pay the Clinton Foundation to be removed from the terror sponsor list...”
Need link!!
Yes it was one of the wiki messages
Good observation. Now they think they can claim `See? We reported on Wikileaks, but the public just wasn`t interested.`
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.