To: Redleg Duke
If the SHTF, those who dont want to get their hands dirty are going to be at the bottom of the food chain!A human thigh would be a substantial piece of meat. But would it be best baked or as pot roast?
7 posted on
10/07/2016 6:30:58 AM PDT by
JimRed
(Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
To: JimRed
9 posted on
10/07/2016 6:32:33 AM PDT by
who knows what evil?
(Yehovah saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.com)
To: JimRed
You would eat part of a liberal????
Aren't you concerned about what diseases it might have had...or where it had been?
11 posted on
10/07/2016 6:41:15 AM PDT by
Redleg Duke
(Okay, the Primaries are over and it is us against the DC Uni-Party!)
To: JimRed
A human thigh would be a substantial piece of meat. But would it be best baked or as pot roast?Neither - A ragu with papardelle and Romano.
Accompanied by some fava beans and a nice Chianti of course!
25 posted on
10/07/2016 7:32:53 AM PDT by
NY.SS-Bar9
(Those that vote for a living outnumber those that work for one.)
To: JimRed
Stock up on bbq sauce to mask the rancid flavor.
32 posted on
10/07/2016 8:14:23 AM PDT by
bgill
(From the CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola")
To: JimRed
But would it be best baked or as pot roast? I'd say to braise it. You can't go wrong with low and slow. Especially on a tough cut.
40 posted on
10/07/2016 9:48:12 AM PDT by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(Don't question faith. Don't answer lies.)
To: JimRed
If the SHTF, those who dont want to get their hands dirty are going to be at the bottom of the food chain!
A human thigh would be a substantial piece of meat. But would it be best baked or as pot roast? Baked - or so I am told. (cough) :-)
44 posted on
10/07/2016 10:50:24 AM PDT by
Oatka
(Beware of an old man in a profession where men usually die young.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson