I know they have no shame, but how can they even write articles with a straight face again if Trump wins?
The real question that should be asked: Will Illiarily even be alive by election time.
Video of Illiarily not able to walk in NYC parade this year 26 June 2016:
Upshot of article: Trump will lose, but not concede - shattering the pillars of democracy.
Fair enough if he loses, challenges the loss in court, the issue is objectively analyzed, and the result is decided one way or another.
It’s not like Trump is then likely to raise a Tea Party Army and wage civil war.
.. for the same reason you post them here.
What if Obama won’t except election results and the installation of a new commander-in-chief in 2017?
What if Politico won’t take their med’s on Nov 9th?.... They are gonna need them...
As their nominee unravels,...
Lord have mercy:-)
I have no trouble envisioning Trump giving a concession speech - amounting to a favorite ad’s punchline “sure you can buy a hamburger for a dollar...but then you’d have to eat it.” He might just then cash out, buy some serious property out west, and declare the Trump Redoubt/Gulch where the producers can withdraw while the Left turns the rest into Venezuela Redux.
Only if there is massive voter fraud, such as the dead voting, massive numbers of newly registered “voters” vote absentee from the same address, Dems vote both in their winter state of residence and state of residence, Dem college students vote both at college and home, and Dems voting (without required ID) for those they know are not voting or out of town.
In other words, exactly what normally happens in Dem controlled areas of the country.
Just think what the outcome would be if we voted according to Mexican voting law (government issued ID with photo and fingerprint).
Tut..Tut don’t worry. He won’t lose. So will Hillary pull an Algore and refuse to concede? Bet you won’t find any Politico articles about that.
Does Bill Kristol have a new pen name, over at Polutico?
No thanks!
Having vetted him thoroughly, I've come to the conclusion that he stands a pretty good chance of winning. Nothing is a foregone conclusion, particularly when it comes to a Clinton, but right now, I think he's looking pretty good.
Thus - and here's my point - I find all of the gaslighting by the media particularly disconcerting. I'm not sure what bothers me the most, the blatant lies, the fact that the MSM thinks I'm stupid enough to believe them, or the fact that they just don't care anymore.
It's obvious to anyone with a modicum of political horse sense that Trump is in a far better position than McCain ever was. Romney, who I mistakenly thought had the 2012 election cold, in hindsight ran an extremely flawed campaign as well (better than McCain, but still awful) and never really stood a chance of winning.
Trump, on the other hand, is doing many of the same - successful - things that BO did to win. He's attacking every slight, real and perceived, and not letting his opponent get a toehold. He's using social media to his advantage - something BO did well while Hillary is still stuck in the 80s and 90s mode of campaigning via TV spots - the same mistakes made by Republicans in '08 and '12.
It's possible that Trump still won't win, but it's far from the foregone conclusion that's portrayed by our once-great, but now-dishonest media.
What if the MSM won’t accept Hillary’s defeat?
Trump’s fund-raising effort is not for his campaign...it’s for his fight against voter fraud should he lose.
IF...he loses. Every precinct that is within the allowed recount % WILL be recounted and his campaign fund will be flush with money to make it happen.
Mrs. Trump dint raise no fool!
What type of ridiculous questions is this? There are options in place for Trump to request recounts, prove voter fraud, or accept the decision. Those are his only three options. They are all written down for everyone to see.
This is just another scare tactic display by the libs in their efforts to try to swing the election. And judging by the level of this they are getting desperate, But the real fun in this article is that while they are trying to breed gloom and doom, they are failing to display that Trump took 1.4 million primary votes more than any other candidate in our history for a presidential primaries effort. And thats been since our Constitution was ratified in 1783. Let’s do the math for our unfortunate soul, that’s 234 years since you have to include 1783 as it was part of the process.
And that number is very important. It may just be the amount of time it may take to get a lying, treasonous, money hungry, anti-American shrew like Hilary elected.
Go back to your college students with this manure. Adults don’t want their space filled with it. Adults don’t deal with childish antics. Have better things to do.
red
What if monkeys fly out of my butt?
And Al Gore was so gracious in his defeat wasn’t he?
What if the human filth, criminals and brown nosing journalist won’t accept Hillary going to jail for stealing from the American people? Hey, Eli Stokols you got a soft spot for criminals?
How come you DC types live so much better than your salaries would justify?
On the take there Eli Stokols?
Wealthiest ZIP Codes in the United States - find the pattern:
#10. McLean, VA 22101
(McLean is home to many ... members of congress, and high-ranking government officials)
#6. Potomac, MD 20854
(sam)
#5. Chappaqua, NY 10514
(Hillary, Bill, and liberal elites)
#4. Great Falls, VA 22066
( Many of its residents commute into Washington, D.C. for work.)
#2. Fairfax Station, VA 22039
(Fairfax Station. This town is a popular suburb with people who work for the federal government, and has some of the top public school counties in the country.)
Surprisingly the wealthiest ZIP code in the country (#1) is NOT filled with ‘public servants... yet)
http://www.businessinsider.com/the-wealthiest-zip-codes-in-america-2014-5?op=1
Can hil-liar-y raise her right hand in order to swear in...you know her stroke and all.
This talk mind you is before the first debate