To: SE Mom
“But notice its not specific to the Dems, but to ‘U.S. elections’...”
But notice that those are not the words of Assange himself, but the words of the CNN propagandist. When you go to the actual article you can see that “a lot more material” is a quote, but then Matthew Chance, the propagandist summarizes Assange without quotes with the phrase “relevant to the US electoral campaign.” They then pick up the same ambiguity for the headline. They don’t tell you exactly what Assange said in the interview.
83 posted on
07/26/2016 11:20:20 PM PDT by
Cap Huff
(1776 - Washington fought on our side. 2016 Washington is fighting against us . . .)
To: Cap Huff; Dog; Straight Vermonter; Bigtigermike; RayChuang88; Uncle Miltie; SE Mom; SunkenCiv; ...
The metadata in the leaked documents are perhaps most revealing: one dumped document was modified using Russian language settings, by a user named Феликс Эдмундович, a code name referring to the founder of the Soviet Secret Police, the Cheka, memorialised in a 15-ton iron statue in front of the old KGB headquarters during Soviet times. The original intruders made other errors: one leaked document included hyperlink error messages in Cyrillic, the result of editing the file on a computer with Russian language settings. After this mistake became public, the intruders removed the Cyrillic information from the metadata in the next dump and carefully used made-up user names from different world regions, thereby confirming they had made a mistake in the first round. http://motherboard.vice.com/read/all-signs-point-to-russia-being-behind-the-dnc-hack
98 posted on
07/27/2016 3:21:23 AM PDT by
AdmSmith
(GCTGATATGTCTATGATTACTCAT)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson