Do you think many in the neurology profession are going to be talking about this behind the scenes? I know that if I were a professional in the field this would absolutely fascinate me, from the standpoint of the interface between medical knowledge and political power.i.e., what conditions render someone truly unfit for the Presidency, as compared with what diagnoses are acceptable and manageable for someone with “ultimate” power (nuclear etc.) over our world?
Will neurologists as a professional group or as individuals have an obligation to speak out if they know Hillary to be unfit, or at least make recommendations to the public etc.? Who gets to decide if Hillary should not longer be permitted to deceive the public about her health and mental capacities? etc.