Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: bananaman22

So what does one have to do with the other? Lame....


2 posted on 07/18/2016 11:17:09 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sacajaweau

“So what does one have to do with the other? Lame....”

My thought as well.


5 posted on 07/18/2016 11:19:50 AM PDT by Parley Baer (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau

I agree. So what if they want to invest in Mexico? A wall is not going to stop it. What they are really thinking is that they don’t want to lose their source of illegal workers.


25 posted on 07/18/2016 12:16:10 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau; bananaman22

Very lame.

First, ILLEGAL crossings have nothing whatsoever to do with the oil trade.

Second, investments in Mexico are very safe for the oil majors - the DESPERATELY need the money, and definitely can’t drill it themselves in any kind of efficient way. Hell, their production was declining in an era of fracking and other techniques to more reliably find oil and get it out of the ground. They are utterly incompetent, and NEED our majors to survive.

What’s the next argument, that the big oil companies really want (fracking ban) Hillary? Hahahahahahahahahaha!


29 posted on 07/18/2016 1:27:53 PM PDT by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau

Indeed if anything it’s 180 out.


30 posted on 07/18/2016 1:46:41 PM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson