Are people really surprised that the terms of a contract must be adhered to when the person is fired?
Faux outrage.
Indeed. The superintendent did very well for herself. Good on her.
“Are people really surprised that the terms of a contract must be adhered to when a person is fired?”
Faux outrage.
It’s not faux, IMO. It’s just useless b—ching after the fact, instead of changing it so it won’t happen to begin with.
Prime example of the Bushism: It’s not the government’s money. It’s the taxpayer’s money.
These outrageously lucrative contracts can be challenged, and rewritten, and placed on a ballot to be voted on, by taxpayers with the will to take action.