Posted on 06/25/2016 8:58:22 AM PDT by Seizethecarp
Excerpt via print piece at Politico:
Oh, and he expended millions in county resources to fruitlessly pursue Barack Obama’s “fake” birth certificate (a crusade he insists isn’t over by a long shot). That’s what got him his first give-‘em-hell letter from part-time birther Trump. “That's not dead as far as I'm concerned,” he told me.
(Excerpt) Read more at birtherreport.com ...
Thanks for reminding me - wow, you have a fantastic brain and memory. I had forgotten about that. I wonder when HI removed the dates and certificate numbers from their birth index. Amazing how much the HI Dept of Health did just to cover up the criminal identity fraud.
I’m not trying to say what they DID, what I am saying is it sure LOOKS that way.
The total number of births in that period could not be altered. They could not just drop one, as if it never happened. But covering one up because it had a name that just wouldn’t look right on an index, by some weird acromyn that no one understands, leaves the total unchanged.
https://www.allacronyms.com/MAE
Thanks for correction. But, being the dullard that I am, what name would they be covering up, or why? I think this was discussed years ago but I cannot remember the details.
You're getting mad at me but you never pinged me before in this thread. Since I hadn't yet read every post in the entire thread, I had not yet read messages not addressed to me.
...and btw, that quote you attributed to me, was written by another freeper.
In #71 I was responding to Candor7's comment in #69. I did not attribute any quote to you and did not message you previously in this thread.
If I have time I may come back to this thread and read your posts.
However, when they printed out the names for the births for 1960-1964, alphabetically, if there had been a birth in January and another in August for the same name, YOU WOULD SEE TWO NAMES THE SAME.
Therefor the entry for August is a fake. And the January birth has become a DUPLICATE MAE.
You’re right, I assumed you had addressed your comment to me. Sorry about that.
Oh, I get it. So they had them listed by month at least. Of course, that makes total sense. If they take a name out, it messes up the total, so they have to have the MAE thing. Sorry, I read it so quickly I missed that sentence that made it clear.
They took the easy way out. Removed one. Called it DUPLICATE MAE ERROR. But of course it's still there under the name of OBADO. They didn't reduce the birth total by one, only the NAME disappeared.
The dead child then had a BC issued two weeks later, WHEN HER DEATH CERTIFICATE WAS AMENDED.
zero bc number = 10641
died VS number = 11080
Same date, August 4, 1961. Difference = 439.
Over and out. No one is interested, it's all too complicated. Bye.
THE index is alphabetical. The index you see is for FIVE YEARS.
1960. 1961. 1962. 1963. 1964.
When printed out, if there were two births in those five years for JOHN SMITH then the names would appear one underneath the other.
scroll the image to the right hand side, there they be: 
Stupendous research mate. I know that you have put heart and soul into the research, against all comers and agencies, bound to protect the chosen one, and their narrative, and at the least, have given cause to doubt the who, what, when, where, and why, of the cypher known as: Barry Barrack Hussein Soetoro Soebarkah Obama Rama Lama Ding Dong. GRRR!
I’m so grateful to encounter you and your work- here, on the www/FR, and that you have, even over threat of acquittal, hung in there, and continued to post and contribute, to the unmasking of one of the greatest hoaxes ever perpetrated on a free people!
Thank you Fred Nerks. I think you have the bug and are going to see this to the end.
Sheriff Arpaio, and Donald J. Trump, in the position of POTUS, might, once and for all- open the lock box of the century. Don’t go away bro! Thanks, and thanks again.
I’ve been around since 1998 homeboy- you exhibit all the classic markers of a sleeper agent. I don’t remember seeing your name back in the day... 2008/2009 to the present, on the Obama investigative research threads. Your recent presence raises suspicions- to say the least. The stalwarts posting here, have golden credentials due to their tireless research. My impression of you, is circumspect. Prove all of us wrong or go find another platform. Your back and forth, smells of fogbow lineage. We don’t hanker to fogbow lineage around these parts. Straighten up and fly right, or get busy with seppuku.
So... who is that little boy?
So she and her parents raised him because ... ???
And his real mother and father are ... ???>>>>>>>>>>>>
See post # 70
Just using common sense - reviewing all the hassle required/he went thru to get a reissue - when you have an authentic one in your pocket - Occam’s razor(The more assumptions you have to make, the more unlikely an explanation is.)
The son of the Kenyan, who was born in HI to a woman who was not SAD, who moved to Kenya when he was very young, and was raised by the Kenyan Obama and his wife Ruth who soon joined him in Kenya.
The little boy did not grow up to be president of the US.
He was all over the research threads doing the same thing.
I get it....I believe. but... lemme think.
I would assign near 100% certainty that the little boy is Malik and that the photo was taken in 1959 just before BHO Sr. departed for the US.
The boy is the spitting image of the father. The mother and grandmother are in the photo. The boy looks to be a tiny toddler of about 1.5 years old to me, as he would have been in late 1959. Malik was born in March 1958, according to Wiki.
I see no indication or evidence that this toddler is any other child or that the photo was taken in any other time-frame.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.