Posted on 06/24/2016 11:58:59 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Democratic National Committee documents leaked by a hacker Tuesday reveal that Hillary Clintons requirements to give a speech included a private flight and a luxurious presidential hotel suite.
One of the documents leaked is a form filled out by the University of Nevada, Las Vegas Foundation for the Harry Walker Agency. The Harry Walker Agency is a speakers bureau, which represented Hillary Clinton. On top of the $225,000 fee for her 20 minute speech, the agency gave the UNLV Foundation standard travel expenses for Clinton.
This include[s] a chartered roundtrip private air transportation (e.g., a Gulfstream 450 or larger jet), which must be paid in advance of the event. The host will also need to pay for roundtrip business class airfare to and from the event city for two (2) advance staffers who will arrive in the city of the engagement up to three (3) business days prior to the event, the document reads.
The host is responsible for hotel accommodations at a hotel identified by Speakers staff. Accommodations should include a presidential suite for the Speaker and up to three (3) adjoining or contiguous single rooms for her travel aides and up to two (2) additional single rooms for the advance staff. The host is responsible for all ground transportation for the Speaker, her travel aides and the advance staff while they are in the city of the engagement....
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
Hillary is a cross between Imelda Marcos and Winnie Mandela.
Gulfstream G450 is around $6K per flight hour.
Hillary gets more than ten thousand a minute for her dumb speech.
The elites are completely out of control.
Where did the money come from and who authorized it?
Did Hellary really sell 20 percent of the American Uranium to Russia in exchange for over 100 million to be paid to the Clinton foundation.
How can this be? Where was the congressional oversight?
and what on earth are these worthless “speeches” that Shrillary was giving for 20 min.???
What insanity for any organization to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on this hag.... unless it is all about her influence-peddling.
“Hillary is a cross between Imelda Marcos and Winnie Mandela.”
I find that an apt description, even more so if, ‘but without their charm’ is affixed.
In fact, if the actual job-description for the one she wants were commensurate with her skills, it would ask for a world-class money launderer and thief.
Bitch of the people.
L
But youmare forgetting the THREE DAYS for her “advance staff” (at adjoining presidential room rates and per diem and meal charges) AND THEIR business class round trip airfare and in-city travel.
Add it all up. The $225,000.00 “speakers fee” is not the only thing they’ve got to pay.
What is teeth grindingly infuriating is that a lot of this is paid from ( mandatory) student fees.
AT $10,000 a minute, Hillary could pay off the national debt in 100,000 years and one minute. But she won’t.
She is a greedy, filthy. pernicious, pecuniophile.
I think any stock-holders knew what the board was doing...they’d fire them right away. Maybe private foundations can get away with this...but a public company would be wasting tons of money on zero return.
Have you ever viewed one of her speeches? It’s the kind of stuff you’d expect from a first-year college student.
Did you forget to mention she is a greedy, filthy, fat, pernicious, porky, pecuniophile who hasn’t done an honest days work in her life?
No. But I will.
Interesting post.
“Leaked Docs Reveal Hillary’s Demand for Extreme Luxury.”
Finally someone mentioned it. Judge Janine. We need to keep this missing money question and “What happened to Kadaffi’s GOLD ?” Out there!
“Influence peddling “. Or Blackmale. Don’t rule that out. She IS queen of the FBI File scandal. It is sort of her MO
The NYT report WRT the sell-off of strategic US uranium assets noted that the uranium investors also donated to the Clinton Foundation:
<><> Canadian Frank Giustraglobe-trotting pal of Bill-donated $31.3 million and a pledge for $100 million more to the Clinton Foundation. Giustra built a company that later merged with Uranium One. Seems to have facilitated the uranium sell-off.
<><> Canadian Ian Telferdonated $2.35 million to the Clinton Foundation. Mining investor who was chairman of Uranium One when an arm of the Russian government, Rosatom, acquired it.
<><>Paul Reynoldsdonated $1 million to $5 million to the Clinton Foundation Adviser on 2007 UrAsia-Uranium One merger. Later helped raise $260 million for the company.
<><>Frank Holmes-donated $250,000 to $500,000 to the Clinton Foundation. Chief Executive of U.S. Global Investors Inc., which held $4.7 million in Uranium One shares in the first quarter of 2011.
<><> Canadian Neil Woodyer-Founded Endeavour Mining with Giustradonated $50,000 to $100,000 to the Clinton Foundation. Adviser to Uranium One.
<><> GMP Securities Ltd.-Donating portion of profits to the Clinton Foundation. Worked on debt issue that raised $260 million for Uranium One. (could also be the money-laundering apparat)
===========================================
As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.
And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.
At the time, both Rosatom and the United States government made promises intended to ease concerns about ceding control of company assets to the Russians. Those promises have been repeatedly broken, records show. (hat tip amorphous)
cont
Hillary and Frank Giustra, left.
Hes a gold mining mogul......he facilitated the takeover of US uranium assets.... he received tax dollars from Hillary's State Dept.
Canadian mining magnate Frank Giustra is one of the Clinton Foundations largest donors. Giustra's $100 million contributions go directly:
<><> (1) to the tax-exempt Clinton Foundation, and,
<><> (2) to the Canada-based "Clinton-Giustra Enterprise Partnership."
The "Clinton-Giustra Enterprise Partnership" in turn sends money to the Clinton Foundation...(according to Canadian tax records researched by "Clinton Cash" author Schweizer).
DATA Sources: Clinton Foundation, CGEP (Canada);
Canadian tax records; compiled by Alberto Cuadra and
Rosalind Helderman May 3 at 8:11 PM
ARTICLE LINK http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/wealthy-canadian-helps-fund-the-clinton-foundation/2015/05/03/f855ea22-f1ea-11e4-90bc-afe06f530791_graphic.html
============================================
The NY Times reported the "Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership" collected about $33 million US tax dollars from Hillary's State Dept between 2008 and 2013.....$25 million of which was passed back across the border to the US-based Clinton Foundation.
Giustra then pledged $100 million to the Foundation after Clinton helped him clinch the mega-bucks uranium deal.
ITEM---millions of dollars and 1,100 donors are shrouded in mystery in the Canadian Giustra/Clinton operation. The Clinton Foundation signed a memorandum of understanding with the Obama White House agreeing to reveal its contributors every year. The agreement stipulates that the Clinton Giustra Sustainable Growth Initiative (as the charity was then-known) is part of the Clinton Foundation and must follow the same protocols.
SURPRISE: It hasnt.
Caught w/ his pants down, Giustra/s backtracking like crazy---saying Canadas federal privacy law forbids the Canadian-registered Clinton charity, from revealing its donors.
A memo he provided news organs cites fiduciary obligations to its contributors and Canadas Personal Information Privacy and Electronic Disclosure Act. We are not allowed to disclose even to the Clinton Foundation the names of our donors, Giustra says.
However, Canadian tax and privacy law experts were dubious of the Clinton/Giustra claims. A former director knowledgeable about tax policy at Canada's Department of Finance, said he wasnt aware of any tax laws that would prevent the Clinton charity from releasing its donor names. " There's nothing that would preclude them from releasing donor names. It's entirely up to them."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.