Posted on 06/21/2016 5:17:32 AM PDT by WayneDupreeShow
How many of you Donald Trump supporters are starting to worry about what you hear in the media? Their job is to turn your candidate into in an unelectable commodity. They are not supportive of Trump nor do they want him in the White House. If there's one thing that is constant truth it is that Trump is not a politician so the way he campaigns is not like what you're used to seeing, so I wouldn't worry that much about what the media runs on TV.
This morning on NBC's Today, it seemed that the hosts work concern how Hillary Clinton was outraising and outspending Trump. I think they were also trying to push the narrative how voters didn't want to contribute to his campaign.
Trump reminded the hosts how members of the GOP were not jumping on board his campaign and if he had to go it alone he would.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsninja2012.com ...
You know as well as anyone how ridiculous that is.
You cannot expect a handyman fixing your gate to have the same
operating standards as Bechtel or Brown & Root building a chemical plant.
Bloggers are just some handymen, not corporations.
Oh.. they WISH and WANT to be.. but still are just some
mooks re-writing stuff they saw online or heard on the radio.
I really enjoyed his radio show where he interviewed Dolly Kyle, a major victim of the Clintons.
It was very informative chatting with her, she has a lot of dirt on the Clintons.
Thanks Wayne for doing the interviews with her.
LOL my friend you don’t have a clue....
LOLOLOL but I love ya’
Thank you for your hard work. I enjoy your show.
Did the same thing ... my fourth donation. I never donated to any candidate before but this is just way too important.
BUMP! With a Me too
Why don’t you save your bile and venom and take it up with Jim Robinson.
I’m only asking that he not excerpt his own stuff, and here you’re getting all hateful and angry at ME?
So now it’s wrong to actually ask someone to comply with the policies of the site owner?
What you see as a threat is only a fair warning of what could be the outcome of defying the owner’s policies. That applies equally well to all of us. If I violate JimRob’s policy, I’d be grateful to the FReeper who told me so, and amend myself.
But no, YOU, not even Dupree, are going to get all hot and bothered at ME?
I didn’t flag him up to this point, but he really needs to see your kind of unprovoked crazy.
Geesh!
Really?!? Hyperbole much?
(.....and really - I ~was~ being nice.)
You're cranky when nobody gives you a Snickers...
See, here’s this dude who has something to say...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3442403/posts
Note that he does that without redirecting traffic to any
amateur blog run by a homeless dude from a public library.
He’s not some noob either.
He has an actual history here. That would be the big difference right there.
Hit a nerve did I?
When I get back to my computer I’ll copy and paste the part of the message that Jim posted that the the blogophobes here seemed not to see
Nice? Heh
I never knew that condescending was synonymous with nice
Congrats on beating out HG in showing how much TV commercials influence your thought processes
You accuse me of being condescending.
And then follow it up with:
"Congrats on beating out HG in showing how much TV commercials influence your thought processes"
I see the Snickers didn't help.
Perhaps a new bulb for your projector?
(BTW - I watch almost zero TV. The Snickers meme is ubiquitous.)
Thanks! Still true and bears repeating in full:
Believe it or not, once upon a time vanities were frowned upon by our participants. FR’s original format was established to not only fight for liberty and against government abuse/corruption, etc, but to criticize the liberally biased mainstream media. Therefore our original format was to post from valid NEWS sources and government reports, etc, and to tear them down where deserved. Vanity posters were shunned (unless they were very good).
Then a few years ago the blogger craze started. At first, most of them were treated simply as vanities and were pulled or zotted on sight. Eventually some were accepted as valid material on FR. And soon the blogger wars commenced. To allow blogs or not to allow blogs was the question. Can’t go blanket either way. Like it or not, some blogs are better than most others.
So, long story short, we created a special forum for blog posts. This was in lieu of simply deleting all blog posts. The theory was that as long as they were posted in the bloggers forum, those who didn’t wish to read them could simply click on the “news” forum and they wouldn’t see them. But, of course, as some blogs are definitely better than most others and some are much better than your typical mainstream news sources, we soon allowed certain blogs to be posted regularly to the news section.
This all worked more or less to a certain degree without too much friction until the non-commenting, short-excerpting, long-complaining blog pimp was born.
I have no complaint if a good conservative blogger posts his own material to FR, not as an excerpt to drive hits and discussion back to his blog, but rather to impart useful information to OUR readers and to promote and join in on the discussion and conservative activism HERE on FR.
If a blogger can’t or refuses do that, and if he constantly complains or fights with our participants over it, then I’d just as soon he doesn’t post here. It’s not my job to make his content or his presentation or cooperation acceptable to our readers. That’s his job. And if he cannot do it or refuses to do it and continues posting brief excerpts only and obviously attempting to draw away our participants while loudly complaining about it, then I have no sympathy for his complaints and the more apt I am to ban his account and blog.
Furthermore, I’m not big on “rules.” You won’t see me posting rules for bloggers. The rules for bloggers on FR are the same as the rules for everyone else. If you are a good conservative activist and are willing to work with US on OUR goals and causes and not against US, then you’re welcome to post to FR. But unless we say otherwise your blog material should be posted to our bloggers forum and it would be best if you do not excerpt your own material and if you would actually join in on the discussion here on FR. We’re not really that interested in driving OUR traffic to YOUR blog. But if our readers see that you post useful information then they might start reading your site and that’s fine by me.
552 posted on 12/7/2010 2:06:19 PM by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Nuke the corrupt commie bastards to HELL!!)
Read my post again and see if you can figure out what I actually said I was going to do
I’m sure Jim Robinson is thrilled that several of you are painging him to this thread with your whining complaints
I think he has more important things to do
Syncro is ok. One of the good guys.
I paged Jim only because I posted his quote.
Common courtesy.
I know Syncro and I think he’s OK.
It’s the nOObie blogpimp I’m not so sure about.
I know exactly what you were going to do.
You were going to selectively quote from it.
I chose to post the whole thing in context.
So much more meaningful that way - don't you think?
(Nuttin' but luv!)
Don’t bother, as Im not a blogophobe, that’s why you rarely see me on these kind of threads, bitchin’ about anything. You know that.
So, to get back to it, I asked Wayne—not you—why he had to excerpt his own posts...
THEN, you jumped in. So, I’ll ask nicely, since Jim says you’re a good guy, and we’ve both been here for so long, please understand I like Wayne’s writing, but just want to see it all without having to visit his blog. If that offends you still, then I don’t know what else to say.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.