To: 2ndDivisionVet
Destroying property is ok?
Well then he cant complain when the homes of these occupy types are torched.
2 posted on
06/06/2016 9:58:21 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
> After an anti-Trump protest in San Jose descended into mob violence last week, Emmett Rensin, one of Voxs crypto-Marxist editors, suggested people should indeed stage riots if Donald Trump comes to their town. All violence against human lives and bodies is categorically immoral, he wrote. Property destruction is vastly more negotiable.
Property destruction unless its his he means says the #BLM and Knockout game supporter. These guys are so full of $hit they don't even know what they mean anymore. As long as all the victims are white everything goes. He won't say it but we know how his kind thinks.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The left can't win the arguments on merits so they resort to violence.
Not new.
6 posted on
06/06/2016 10:09:33 AM PDT by
BitWielder1
(I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
And the GOPe snowflakes are complaining about what Trump said about an Aztlani Judge who has bias?
7 posted on
06/06/2016 10:09:47 AM PDT by
BigEdLB
(Take it Easy, Chuck. I'm Not Taking it Back -- Donald Trump)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Sanders and Clinton have both “condemned” the violence of their supporters, but I’m sure it’s with a wink and a nod. In at least some of these riots lately, the local democrat party has been one of those organizing them, along with local unions, La Raza, Black Lies Matter, all democrat toadies.
Does anyone actually think that either Sanders or Clinton would risk a huge part of the democrat base just because of rioting?
9 posted on
06/06/2016 10:11:44 AM PDT by
euram
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson