[old curmudgeon]

I looked him up and he may be OK, but there are red flags.

The major one is his claim that he was the bomber or one of the bombers who bombed a bank.

That is his claim to fame.

The bank’s claim s that there was never a bombing incident.

I don’t know who is right but my experience is that people who need to exaggerate to impress others with their importance tend to do so again and again.

So without knowing which story is correct, I am skeptical until the question of who is correct is resolved.

There is also the question of why the airline would not know about his associations if he was blatant about them.

[Big Red Badger]

Fair enough, FRIEND,
I have been to a speech of His back in 2002 at a local University.
Walids response to the very real and intense opposition was inspiring.

[grey_whiskers]

There is also the question of why the airline would not know about his associations if he was blatant about them.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703455804575057612342107400

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/germany/12090655/German-authorities-accused-of-migrant-attack-cover-up.html

http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2002-12-15/entertainment/0212160297_1_van-zandt-serial-killers-snipers

Shirley, you can't be serious.