Posted on 05/05/2016 3:04:38 PM PDT by DrDude
I have been commenting lately on the assumption that the FBI is now actually doing any Investigating. Found the link on Drudge to CNN article. Says Huma and others have been interviewed. It was done very quietly. Now they are ready for Hillary before they wrap up. Of note, they mention the IT guy who was given immunity and his part in the investigation. I hope I did this correctly. Not intending to break any rules.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
This is interesting as some have been asking about the IT guy. Seems he provided information about the computer setup. No actual testimony.
Ready For Hillary. Where have I seen that before?
She’s failing to take out Bernie in the primary and become the nominee. I think that alone makes it more likely she will be indicted. The DNC and Obama are going to want her out of the way. Enter the Biden/Warner ticket.
He’s not dead yet?
Hillary will not be arrested and some more people will be found with suicide notes and bullet holes in the backs of their heads...
Yeah, the hole in which it will be buried is being dug deeper by the day.
Mark my words: they will simply delay until after the election. If she wins then it’s moot because you can’t indict a sitting President without impeaching first.
No, but even with immunity he has refused to answer before Congress.
http://freebeacon.com/politics/clinton-computer-staffer-testify-congress-email/
A few remarks DrDude:
"Title of Thread" box in the posting form is supposed to contain the EXACT title used by the source online, subject to being able to fit, to help people not post duplicates
"Body of Thread" box is supposed to contain an appropriate except from the article's text
"Body of Comments" box is for your personal take on the article.
It would be very helpful if FR's posting page contained better explanations of what is supposed to go into each field. Hope this helps.
Source here: http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/05/politics/fbi-interviews-huma-abedin-clinton-aide/index.html
If the FBI hasn't YET found any evidence to prove Hillary violated ANY laws, KING 0DUNGA OWNS COMEY'S ARSE. Hillary placing her EMAIL SERVER USED FOR OFFICIAL GOV'T BUSINESS in a NON-GOV'T PRIVATE AREA IS ITSELF A FEDERAL CRIME.
Grants of immunity almost universally involve a proffer, where negotiation where there is an agreement regarding prosecution vs. information promised. In this case it was the immunity from prosecution for some specific information regarding the case. To grant immunity and then not seek charges on another person is very rare.
So the leaks favor Hillary. Surprise.
The Clinton’s are protected for life by the press. Anyone who tries to take them down will get Ken Starred.
Immunity means squat when you're worried about a Clinton assassin sneaking around waiting for an opportune moment to take you out at any moment. You better believe that guy knows what the Clintin crime family is capablle of.
There must be some dirt there cuz Bernie seems more politically aligned with Obama than does HRC.
The IT guy has been testifying for weeks now. He also has handed over documents.
Thank you. I am trying to participate more but am not completely computer savy. Thanks again for your assistance.
Pagliano was granted immunity to testify in front of the FBI, and he is so testifying; he has not been granted immunity to testify in front of Congress, and has declined a request to testify in front of Congress.
People keep posting that but I have never seen any documentation that proves is in fact true. In fact I have seen specific examples or minor offenses brought against a sitting president by local authorities.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.