Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Morgana

Here is a handy guide for all you jerks out there:

GRAMMAR POLICE: 12 MISTAKES NEARLY EVERYONE MAKES

As more and more organizations join the owned media way of marketing, the grammar police seem to be in greater force.

Poor Sam Fiorella. Every time he writes something, he asks three or four of us to make sure he isn’t going to be crucified by the grammar police. It’s become quite comical and we enjoy giving him a hard time about it.

But he’s not alone. Many business leaders stress about writing anything at all, for fear of having incorrect grammar that will be made fun of across the web.

Between not knowing correct grammar and the text lexicon, it’s no wonder people are fearful of not just writing, but publishing, their work.

While I am certainly no Grammar Girl, I have found there are mistakes nearly everyone makes, particularly when writing for the web.

All Hail the Grammar Police!

1.Affect vs. effect. The easiest way to remember the difference between the two is affect means “to influence.” So if you’re going to influence something, you will have an affect. If it’s the result of something, it’s an effect.

2.The Oxford comma. In a series of three or more terms, you should use what’s referred to as the Oxford comma. This means you should have a comma before the word “and” in a list. For instance: The American flag is red, white, and blue. Many people debate this, but I’m a believer in it because there are times when you don’t have the extra comma and the sentence doesn’t make sense. I prefer to err on the side of having the Oxford in there.

3.Commas, in general. And speaking of commas, slow down when you’re writing and read your copy out loud. You don’t want to make this mistake: Let’s eat grandma vs. let’s eat, grandma. Poor grandma will be eaten if you forget the comma.

4.Their, they’re, and there. You’d think everyone learned this rule in fourth grade, but it’s a very common mistake. Use “there” when referring to a location, “their” to indication possession, and “they’re” when you mean to say “they are.”

5.Care less. The dismissive “I could care less” you hear all the time is incorrect. If you could care less, that means there is more you could care less about the topic. Most people omit the “not” in that phrase. It should be, “I couldn’t care less.”

6.Irregardless. This word doesn’t exist. It should be regardless.

7.Nauseous. How many times have you said you felt nauseous? This is incorrect. You feel nauseated. Nauseous means something is sickening to contemplate.

8.Your and you’re. Another mistake you see in people’s social media profiles and in the content they create is not correctly using “your” and “you’re.” If you’re meaning to say “you are,” the correct word is “you’re” (like at the beginning of this sentence). Otherwise the word is “your.”

9.Fewer vs. less. Another common mistake, “less” refers to quantity and “fewer” to a number. For instance, Facebook has fewer than 5,000 employees.

10.Quotation marks. Among great debate, people ask all the time whether or not punctuation belongs inside or outside quotation marks. It belongs inside.

11.More than vs. over. I’m pretty sure the advertising agency created this grammatical error. Instead of saying, “We had more than 50 percent growth” in ad copy, “over” allows for more space. So they say, “We had over 50 percent growth.” Drives. Me. Crazy.

12.Me vs. I. I was reading something by a big muckety muck the other day and the copy read, “This year has brought a big personal development for my wife and I…” No, no, no! If you were going to say that without the mention of your wife, you wouldn’t say, “This year has brought a big personal development for I.” You would say “me.” So this year has brought a big personal development for my wife and me.

There are so many grammar mistakes made today, The Elements of Style is on its fourth edition. Also check out the AP Stylebook. While most business writers don’t abide by those rules, most PR professionals do.

Having a copy of both (and referring to them) and asking an editor for help (even if it’s informal like Sam does), you’ll never have to worry about the grammar police.

- See more at: http://www.socialmediatoday.com/content/grammar-police-12-mistakes-nearly-everyone-makes#sthash.roCfKJns.dpuf


38 posted on 04/06/2016 1:34:21 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("If voting made any difference they wouldn't let us do it." --Samuel Clemens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: E. Pluribus Unum

And lets not bring up the cement concrete issue


82 posted on 04/06/2016 1:49:25 PM PDT by al baby (Hi Mom yes I know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Here are two more for your list.

13) Very unique, more unique (unique means one and only)

14) “If I was” instead of “If I were”


90 posted on 04/06/2016 1:53:43 PM PDT by forgotten man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

In regards to number 3:
And speaking of commas, slow down when you’re writing and read your copy out loud.

Lawyer Ad:
Will work on contingency.
No money down.

Should’ve read:
Will work on contingency?
No, money down!


98 posted on 04/06/2016 1:58:45 PM PDT by No_More_Harkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Word of the day: Sprachgefühl.

The grammar rules are there to make communication easier and more accurate.

If you have to stop to consider every its/it’s, there/their/they’re, will/well, than/then, number/amount, that/who, less/fewer, non-possessive ‘s, etc., that’s not efficient and those with sprachgefühl just quit reading.


104 posted on 04/06/2016 1:59:47 PM PDT by Boojum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
My latest pet peeve with local newscasters especially is the mispronunciation of words with 'ing' added, ie. battleing instead of battling.
138 posted on 04/06/2016 2:40:40 PM PDT by pa_dweller (Go ahead Libs, drink the kool-aid. It's got electrolytes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Thank you.


164 posted on 04/06/2016 3:54:58 PM PDT by Inyo-Mono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
The "let's eat grandma" reminds me of something I read many years ago.

A class was given this sentence to punctuate:

woman without her man is a savage

The girls in the class punctuated it this way:

"Woman! Without her, man is a savage."

The boys punctuated it this way:

"Woman, without her man, is a savage."

172 posted on 04/06/2016 4:05:44 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
1.Affect vs. effect. The easiest way to remember the difference between the two is affect means “to influence.” So if you’re going to influence something, you will have an affect. If it’s the result of something, it’s an effect.

GIBBERISH!!!

The author has not noticed that he has switched from discussing the VERB "to effect" to discussing the NOUN "effect."

181 posted on 04/06/2016 4:21:09 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

You forgot two, to, and too.


202 posted on 04/06/2016 5:57:29 PM PDT by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

My pet peeves:

Imply versus infer. Some people use the word infer when they mean imply. I guess they think it sounds fancier.

Less versus fewer. Fewer is used when you have countable objects, e.g., fewer people, fewer commas.

“With all due respect...” That phrase shows zero respect.


223 posted on 04/07/2016 2:56:37 PM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson