Posted on 03/28/2016 11:03:21 AM PDT by NKP_Vet
Whether you like Heidi Cruz or (because of Goldman Sachs) dislike her, there is zero question, she has become a victim in what is shaping up to be a very ugly campaign assault on her husband's character. Heidi is just another victim in a long line of famous politician wives who have had to endure the public humiliation of cheating husbands. Probably the most famous are Hillary Clinton, Jacquelin Kennedy, Ike's wife Mamie and Eleanor Roosevelt. All of these revered First Ladies (yes even Hillary was liked early on) had to endure the hardship of smiling in public all the while having their hearts ripped out by their philandering spouses.
(Excerpt) Read more at crowsnestpolitics.com ...
I would rather see Cruz stick to his message as much as possible, rather than responding to every unsubstantiated allegation. I see no point in a lawsuit that could be milked for months and turned into a sideshow (do the lawsuit later, if at all, but he’s a public figure, so he would have to prove actual malice). I see no point in more denials. I want to hear what he’d do as president.
I have seen no evidence so far supporting these claims, and I am convinced that they will harm conservatives in November. Let’s get back to the issues. Democrats will win a battle over sleaze - their sleazy politicians are much most disgusting than our worst, but their voters don’t care and will vote anyways.
Note: This is almost exactly the same thing I’ve said about Trump on multiple occasions.
I’m against any type of baseless slander, however, I can’t help but think back to how the stories about John edwards, bill clinton, Tiger woods, etc... we’re all just slander when they first started...but eventually became fact. I’m not saying this story is true, just based on past results, it may not be entirely false either.
Crap and gutter slime is what the Trump campaign has devolved into huh?
Trump needs to denounce this crap. Then I would respect him.
Not required.
You need to understand the rules of our new Trumpistic Logic:
It's axiomatic that Con-Man Cruz is guilty.
Ergo, the fact that evidence can never be found just proves how sneaky and duplicitous this shyster is. Moreover, anybody who can cover up evidence so thoroughly must be evil incarnate.
Where was Cruz after he proclaimed that if we gave the GOP the Senate they would repeal ObamaCare....then didn’t?
Agreed.
That’s fair enough and I appreciate your candor and calm
How did Dickens say it or was it Paine
Times that try men’s souls
Every hour that passes without some kind of proof hurts Trump.due to association with NE management.
I am ready to drop my support for Cruz if there is something to this.
Come on Trump supporters.......WHERE"S THE PROOF?
No, he said they were 'poorly educated', as in, they are not elitist Ivy Leaguers.
I bet Fox news would have video of Cruz sitting down for the interview and you would be able to see if his pants match the suit coat she was wearing in the photo.
He was out there keeping his word, fighting it tooth and nail, even against those in his own party.
We all know where Trump was don’t we. He was out supporting and helping elect those like Reid, Schumer, and Pelosi. People he knew that would thwart the handful of conservatives battling Obama and the disaster known as Obamacare.
Spin on Trumpster. Your boy is a leftist and he has fooled you into believing in him.
Hard to defend Trump knowing he supported Reid, Pelosi, Schumer, and Hillary huh?
He could not have been AWOL because he was never elected to the Senate. He was a private citizen running his business.
TPA? TPP? H1B?
Cruz is not as conservative as you think he is.
BS. He was actively working against Cruz and the other handful of true conservatives in the house and senate. He was undermining them at every turn with his support for Reid, Schumer, and Pelosi. After all he was for single payer before he founderstands out it spelled disaster for hom.
Spin on Trumpster.
Paranoid much?
Where is your evidence that he was actively working against Cruz?
Breathe. Breathe.
“It’s unsubstantiated innunedo provided by a tabloid that caters to the less than brilliant portion of our culture”
That sounds pretty much like what John Edwards said when NE first wrote about him. Just sayin’. They have a record of exposing politician’s sex scandals and they have a record of being wrong. I am just waiting to see what they have.
Heidi Cruz event cancelled...
http://www.courierpostonline.com/story/news/2016/03/28/heidi-cruz-haddon-heights/82344060/
His own words, don’t u listen to what he says? Are I that low information?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.