Posted on 03/28/2016 11:03:21 AM PDT by NKP_Vet
Whether you like Heidi Cruz or (because of Goldman Sachs) dislike her, there is zero question, she has become a victim in what is shaping up to be a very ugly campaign assault on her husband's character. Heidi is just another victim in a long line of famous politician wives who have had to endure the public humiliation of cheating husbands. Probably the most famous are Hillary Clinton, Jacquelin Kennedy, Ike's wife Mamie and Eleanor Roosevelt. All of these revered First Ladies (yes even Hillary was liked early on) had to endure the hardship of smiling in public all the while having their hearts ripped out by their philandering spouses.
(Excerpt) Read more at crowsnestpolitics.com ...
Proof?
Amanda wearing a mans suit jacket at the moment he is being ribbed on TV for showing up without one? And they have matching tattoos, and she tweeted at 5:20 am that he was in a fun mood today? And “Daddy Cruz”?
That’s just one of the “Cruz riders” as I like to call them. Look, I was 100% for him when he announced first last year. But its getting pretty obvious what kind of character he is lacking.
Far from it - I want the accusation to be untrue and for Cruz to be aggressive in defending himself. W was notorious for taking abuse and that wasn’t the correct response. In my view you do not let this kind of accusation sit.
As far as your cutesy name calling, I think Trump is the best choice between he and Cruz. But if Cruz prevails, I will be totally happy with that outcome. If that makes me a Trumpazoid, so be it.
I will be very unhappy if neither gets the nomination. I really don’t want to face the prospect of choosing between GOPe and a Democrat.
That’s right
Oh, it is there. Be patient.
[[No vibe just logic. Follow the money.]]
Lol yeah- whatever- unsubstantiated vibe-
I haven't ignored it conveniently. I've ignored it totally and never even think about it cuz I don't care. I don't care about Cruz either except there's a tiny bit of me that's curious about that Amanda chick. She might be a party in an elevator.
Does it bother you that it appears that St. Booger of Goldman Sachs appears to have laundered hush money through Carly Fiorina's campaign. And don't be a retard and say there's no evidence.
“It’s like John Gotti claiming over and over it wasn’t me it was Sammy the Bull”
Exactly
“Hill went on network TV all decked out in virginal pearls,
denying everything, blaming Billy’s B/J on “an invention of
the VRWC.” Bill later admitted to it, was impeached, and disbarred. “
Liz, you have redefined the meaning of WHITE TRASH
LOL!
“These people create a blog in order to trash Cruz on a site like FR where someone might actually see it.”
Pretty much, yea.
Patience.
“Opening riffs to Whole Lotta Love Bttt”
Exactly! You have a good handle on this as far as im concerned.
There’s plenty of time...just wait
That’s about three hours before Chris Moody “broke” the story on CNN, where Amanda works as a consultant.....
Speaking only for myself, I really don't care if a politician commits adultery, because it's a personal matter. The notion that "if his wife can't trust him, how can we" is plain bunk - back when I managed rental properties, my business partner had a new girl behind his wife's back every week, but I never doubted that he'd honor his contracts and pay every dime he owed me or anyone else.
Now, if a politician uses public funds to conduct his extramarital affair or keep it hidden, different story, but then it's the embezzlement, not the adultery, that's the political problem.
Having said that, the reason adultery scandals will stick to Cruz but not to Trump is simple: Trump never made a pretense of being a morally pure, saintly man of God in the way that Elmer Gant...Ted Cruz has. If you go around preaching the way to lead the good life, you'd better be a genuine saint yourself, or else the moral foibles that people normally forgive in others will damn you as a ridiculous hypocrite and conman.
I read Cruz's response. He called the NE garbage and went to blame Trump. That is a weak response. What the poster said is true and is a non-lawyer strong response. Calling names does not change that fact.
Correction: two hours due to Central Time
You find none of this incriminating?
It means nothing?
its just my imagination
We shall see
Yes patience. Let the innuendo continue to fester and hope it pulls as many votes away from Cruz as possible before it eventually fades away into bogus smear obscurity.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.