The tweets are (so far) silly, in nabbing Ted. By the time anything is found out about him [if there is anything to find out at all], the populace will be so over-inoculated with trash, the campaign might just roll on.
I think publications should wait until they have actual dirt on someone before they publish. This way they’ve got them dead to rights.
The tweets are (so far) silly, in nabbing Ted. By the time anything is found out about him [if there is anything to find out at all], the populace will be so over-inoculated with trash, the campaign might just roll on.
I think publications should wait until they have actual dirt on someone before they publish. This way they’ve got them dead to rights.
So basically you are saying it does not matter to Cruz supporters if there might actually be some truth...
Wow...I find that really incongruent since all the Cruz supporters have relentlessly held up Cruz as the “pure, good, best” candidate—above reproach...you know, no affairs, no extra marriages, etc...
Yet, when rumors surface of Ted, the publications are attacked or the people posting the publications....Seems like a double standard to me.
That said, the Tweets mean nothing to me...except that if they are from one of the Fab 5 (or should I say 8), why are you unwilling to consider these communications when you are willing to look at any and all ammo to shoot down Trump. As you may be aware, I have had concerns before all this broke—I have never held Cruz up as some sort of anointed hero.
I just find your zeal to defend dear Ted somewhat in-congruent with your criticism of Trump supporters using a tweet from 3 years ago.