[GodGunsGuts]

Can you believe this is in FR’s Front Page News?! The “article” is authored by a gentleman by the name of “U.S.Reporter” offers zero proof beyond an email from an anonymous person and a supposed picture of Utah ballots. And then this “Front Page” article concludes with the following editor’s note:

“Editor’s Note: From the description above, it seems those squeaky-clean, up-standing Mormons out in Utah are politically sleazy! We’d hate to do business with people who behave in such a way. Perhaps those of you who do business with them ought to re-think the relationship - and bring it to a halt before the Mormons sleaze you out of everything.”

That the heck has happened to this place???!???!?!?!?!?!?!?

[duffee]

“What the heck has happened to this place???!???!?!?!?!?!?!?”

It is no longer a Conservative site, it is the Trump only site. Nothing matters but TRUMP, TRUMP, TRUMP.

[kinsman redeemer]

“They” did the same thing after Wyoming. It’s the same thing the Dems do when they lose.

[Elsie]

That the heck has happened to this place???!???!?!?!?!?!?!?

Nothing.

If it's bogus; there are plenty of FReepers that WILL chase down the FACTS and post them.

---

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Raw Data 

Republican Results

Republican Caucuses

 

Candidates	Vote	Pct.		Delegates
Ted Cruz	122,567	69.2%		40
John Kasich	29,773	16.8%		—
Donald J. Trump	24,864	14.0%		—
Other	0	0.0%		—

177,204 votes, 89% reporting (1,982 of 2,235 precincts)

Utah Caucus Results

 

Last updated March 23  5:06 PM ET

Democratic Results

Democratic Caucuses

Sanders has won Utah, according to A.P.

Candidates	Vote	Pct.		Delegates
Bernie Sanders	61,333	79.3%		26
Hillary Clinton	15,666	20.3%		6
Other	345	0.4%		—

77,344 votes, 99% reporting (2,215 of 2,235 precincts)

 

                                                                                                                                                                       I wonder who Other is for the Dems???                      

 

 

[MD Expat in PA]

I noted the same thing in my post # 78. In addition, Superstation95 posts all sorts of unsubstantiated wild and alarmist conspiracy stories, often posting pictures that have nothing to do with what they claim it “proves” and many false claims, and Superstation95 - which I think short wave radio station also broadcasts (or did – no new shows but they still broadcast his old shows) Hal Turner – the white supremacist cum FBI informant. I see that at least it has now been moved to Bloggers & Personal. But if inforwars.com is a banned site here, I’m not sure how other equally nutty sites like this get a free pass.

While I know a lot of people don’t like Snopes around here, they do a pretty good job of outing these type of sites and their false and misleading claims.

Photos that claim to show the effects of the Fukushima nuclear disaster on marine life are actually cribbed from various unrelated corners of the internet.

The article published by Superstation95 on 15 October 2015 (and subsequent posts on social media) used half-truths, misleading statistics, and unrelated photos in order to convince its readers that they had been ingesting radioactive seafood. While the Fukushima disaster certainly had effects on the environment and marine life, they are not adequately demonstrated by the photographs circulating in social media, nor by Superstation95.