[ExSoldier]

It's been thirty years since I went to law school, and being a full time social studies teacher for the last 26 years, I'm a little rusty. But I did a fast search and got THIS which I still doubt meets the requirements needed since there seems to be a contract lacking unless you claim that winning an election falls under the quasi contract doctrine. And what would be the remedy? Specific Performance? If you lost the election there can be no specific performance. What would be the claim position? Promissory estoppel? How are the donors financially harmed or damaged based on the sums donated and the specific outcome of the election? Do you propose to return the funding to each and every donor to a status quo ante position? How do you determine the level of damages to each donor and how should the monetary awards be prioritized? Folks, gimme a break.

Here it ends for me. Like my pal Forrest said: I'm getting pretty tired. I think I'll stop now." Or words to that effect.

[AEMILIUS PAULUS]

I agree with your withdrawal as it is usually a waste of time to debate complicated issues in a forum like this. There is usually not enough time or writing space when one discusses a legal issue.p>