“You offer no suggestion as a substitute.
Ineligible, unseasoned or dynasty are not choices for me.”
That pretty much devastates the entire field.
Ineligible, c’mon. They are all eligible.
Unseasoned - That wipes out Cruz, Rubio, trump, and Carson.
Dynasty - Bush.
That leaves Kasich????
By that reasoning, the only ones qualified to be president are those who have already been president. Obama is seasoned, Hillary is seasoned (by marriage), Bush is seasoned (by family).
But Trump, as CEO of a huge company, is not.
I believe original intent of Founding Fathers was to be sure the candidate had no divided allegiance and always put our country first.
I am sorry that this has not been stated more clearly nationwide and constitutionally updated to current reality,,, IT HAS NOT! ( Courts should interpret NOT MAKE law)
Eligibility:
So, can I say a child of future citizens at birth is OK?
So, can I say a single citizen parent who MAY have given up citizenship or accepted another, as well, to get on voting rolls in a second country is OK? ( not considering father at all)
Unseasoned...you are right I was thinking Carson and his medical background and soft demeanor. I was not thinking flamboyant Trump and his history in business deals so large I can not contemplate them.
Kasich?? I do not see a winner there either.
I am sure we both want the best for the country, and to defeat the other party that we despise , but who is there to back that I am missing?