Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

The U.S. Senate is presently not in session. It better get into session FAST and stay in session so Obama does not make a recess appointment. Also, the Senate session ends on January 3, 2017 and the new Senate takes over. I don't know if there is a recess at that time, and if there is, whether it can be prevented without interfering with the change to the new Senate. Perhaps Obama will be able to do a recess appointment at that time since he will be President until January 20, 2017. If he do make such a recess appointment around January 3, 2017, I am not sure how long that appointment can last. The author of the article below states that a recess appointment would last until the end of the Senate's next session. If anybody finds an article nailing down these potential situations, please share. Thanks.
1 posted on 02/13/2016 5:03:13 PM PST by AJFavish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: AJFavish

They might not be able to hold the line against Obama with weak sisters like Lindsey Graham ready to vote for an Obama nominee.


2 posted on 02/13/2016 5:07:41 PM PST by Iron Munro (The wise have stores of choice food and oil but a foolish man devours all he has. Proverbs 21:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJFavish
...there is a five-day recess this week...

Uh-oh.

3 posted on 02/13/2016 5:09:12 PM PST by Publius ("Who is John Galt?" by Billthedrill and Publius now available at Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJFavish
They need to stay in session until January 3rd 2017
4 posted on 02/13/2016 5:09:12 PM PST by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJFavish

Is it true that a recess appointment can be made for the Supreme Court?

That’s not a Cabinet position.


5 posted on 02/13/2016 5:09:15 PM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJFavish

I don’t believe this Senate of Cowards will hold up a nomination for the better part of a year. As soon as someone accuses them of obstructing the government, they’ll fold like a cheap suit.


6 posted on 02/13/2016 5:10:33 PM PST by cydcharisse (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJFavish

Looks like I picked the wrong year to stop drinking.

But, I may just have to take up glue-sniffing until 12:01 PM on Jan. 20, 2017


7 posted on 02/13/2016 5:10:45 PM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJFavish

Obama will nominate a moderate, RINOS will confirm.Another Breyer or Ginsburg.


9 posted on 02/13/2016 5:12:25 PM PST by TornadoAlley3 ( I'm Proud To Be An Okie From Muskogee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJFavish
The Constitution says (Art. II, Sec. 2):

"The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of the next Session."

What was envisioned was that there would be long intervals between sessions and the President could fill vacancies in the periods when the Senate was not in session. Presumably by the end of the session was meant when they adjourned, since they would have had the opportunity to act on any nominations while in session. Presidents of both parties have abused this power in recent years (the Democrats more egregiously, of course). Obama used it to put radicals who could not be confirmed on the NLRB during periods when the Senate was meeting pro forma but not conducting any business.

11 posted on 02/13/2016 5:12:39 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJFavish

IMO even this batch of quislings will see that its in their best interest to wait til Trump takes office.


16 posted on 02/13/2016 5:16:24 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJFavish

This year the democrats have only 10 senate seats up for reelection. The republicans have 24 senate seats up for reelection. There is only a 5 vote lead by the republicans, iirc. Odds are that the senate will change hands.

If the new senate is seated on 3 January and Obama doesn’t leave until 20 January, the republicans better damn well hope they can hold onto the senate.

They can appoint a new Scotus justice with the majority and 2.5 weeks to work. They would have to go nuclear, but they will.


24 posted on 02/13/2016 5:21:14 PM PST by xzins (Have YOU Donated to the Freep-a-Thon? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJFavish

...The Senate stands adjourned to then convene for a pro forma sessions only, with no business conducted on the following dates and times: Monday, February 15th at 11:00am, Thursday, February 18th at 9:00am. When the Senate adjourns on Thursday, February 18th, it will next convene at 3:00pm on Monday, February 22nd...

Someone had better get with it to avoid an Obama end ru .


26 posted on 02/13/2016 5:25:37 PM PST by Sasparilla (Hillary for Prosecution 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJFavish
Here's my prediction:

Obama will nominate an inexperienced non-Christian leftist to the Supreme court.

The GOP-e, scared to death of being called racist, sexist, homophobic or whatever, will cower before his majesty and approve the nomination post haste.

It's disgusting. The GOP-e will lie down and let Obama and his ilk steamroll right over them.

Ted Cruz, want my vote? Get back to the Senate and stop this inevitable totalitarian power grab from happening.

29 posted on 02/13/2016 5:28:26 PM PST by Jess Kitting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJFavish

In 2010 & 2012 the GOPe promised to get rid of Obamacare. They lied. In 2016 they promise to hold off until the new president is sworn in. How could anyone believe them? They don’t work for US, that should be pretty clear by now. Prepare to be disappointed yet again. UniParty vs. We The People. Who will win?


33 posted on 02/13/2016 5:33:54 PM PST by Right-wing Librarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJFavish

36 posted on 02/13/2016 6:09:41 PM PST by Slyfox (Ted Cruz does not need the presidency - the presidency needs Ted Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJFavish

Ruth Buzzy Ginsberg was suppose to be the one to keel over, not Scalia. God help us now.


37 posted on 02/13/2016 6:54:04 PM PST by KosmicKitty (Liberals claim to want to hear other views, but then are shocked to discover there are other views)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJFavish

I assume we will not have a Rat POTUS in 2017. The GOP will want the choice for Rubio, Kasich or Bush (who would be acceptable nominees to the elites). There seems a reasonable chance they will not confirm anyone before the next POTUS.


41 posted on 02/13/2016 7:22:47 PM PST by PghBaldy (12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson