Breitbart is in the business of generating traffic and selling clicks so they have a tendency to sensationalize and generate stories in ways that maximize that. They have to keep people wound up to keep them interested and clicking. I think of them as the HuffPo of the right.

They do have some good reporting at times but other times, their headlines can be misleading. I always keep in mind that BB is first and foremost, a business.

Now Teddy’s bears are re-posting unsourced fiction form August.

Desperation.

As an entrepreneur who operates within the law. You don’t like the laws, work to change them.

Why the personal attacks?

People say trump is free from strings due to his wealth. From what I’ve seen he has tremendous investments overseas. That equates to big strings since he doesn’t want to lose those investments.

Prove it.

Here are some worthless cheap shots! ;-)

Either Ted Cruz is a original-intent Constitutionalist and therefore ineligible to be President or he is a living-document Constitutionalist and eligible to be President. It is one or the other, but it can't be both.

Here is Ted Cruz certificate of birth. It says he was born a Canadian, not an American.

The author of the 14th Amendment says Ted Cruz is not a natural-born citizen.

Winners Aren't Losers or for that matter Cruzers!

Donald EMINENT DOMAIN FOR PRIVATE USE" Trump has been a PROVEN SOCIALIST for years, now !

THEN there's NO DOUBT ABOUT HIM !
HE'S A SOCIALIST !

Standard tactic...unnamed sources...nothing new.

So, The Donald gets some good coverage and everyone’s panties are in a wad??

Did I get that right?

You people have lost your minds. Everyone’s a lefty now but you all. Drudge and Breitbart are traitors to the cause over a damned primary campaign without a vote cast yet. You’re all going to have to check in to the nervous hospital.

It was Settled in 1790 and AGAIN in 1802!

In 1798, the law on naturalization was changed again.

in 1798, the Alien Enemy Act, gave the president the power during a time of war to arrest or deport any alien thought to be a danger to the government.

the 1798 naturalization law was repealed, or overturned (in 1802).

The basic provisions of the original 1790 law WERE RESTORED except for the period of residency before naturalization.
The residency requirement, that is, the amount of time the immigrant had to reside, or live, in the United States, was put back to five years, as it had been in 1795.

that banned slavery and gave African American men the right to vote.

especially Asian countries, but these laws did not affect limits on naturalization.

Did you know ...

if she married an alien (who was therefore not a citizen).

this provision was repealed and a woman's citizenship status was separated from her husband's.

Also Notice the signature blocks at the bottom of this:

1st United States Congress, 21-26 Senators and 59-65 Representatives

So READ THE LATEST FROM the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), the government agency that oversees lawful immigration to the United States.

http://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_citi.html

And what's YOUR source, some COMMUNIST COLLEGE PROFESSOR ? READ IT AGAIN, KNOT-HEAD !

Constitutional Topic: Citizenship ... Citizenship is mentioned inArticle 1, Section 2, Article 1, Section 3, Article 1, Section 8, Article 2, Section 1, and in the 14th Amendment and several subsequent amendments. If you're going to be involved in government in the United States, citizenship is a must. To be a Senator or Representative, you must be a citizen of the United States. To be President, not only must you be a citizen, but you must also be natural-born. Aside from participation in government, citizenship is an honor bestowed upon people by the citizenry of the United States when a non-citizen passes the required tests and submits to an oath. Natural-born citizen Who is a natural-born citizen? Who, in other words, is a citizen at birth, such that that person can be a President someday? The 14th Amendment defines citizenship this way:"All persons born or naturalized in the United States,and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." But even this does not get specific enough. As usual, the Constitution provides the framework for the law, but it is the law that fills in the gaps. The Constitution authorizes the Congress to do create clarifying legislation inSection 5 of the 14th Amendment; the Constitution, in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4, also allows the Congress to create law regarding naturalization, Currently, Title 8 of the U.S. Code fills in the gaps left by the Constitution. Section 1401 defines the following as people who are "citizens of the United States at birth:" Anyone born inside the United States ** There is an exception in the law - - the person must be "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States. This would exempt the child of a diplomat, for example, from this provision. Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person's status as a citizen of the tribe Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S. Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national Any one born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year Any one found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21 Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this time) A final, historical condition:a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S. Anyone falling into these categories is considered natural-born, and is eligible to run for President or Vice President. These provisions allow the children of military families to be considered natural-born, for example. Separate sections handle territories that the United States has acquired over time, such asPuerto Rico (8 USC 1402), Alaska (8 USC 1404), Hawaii (8 USC 1405), the U.S. Virgin Islands (8 USC 1406), and Guam (8 USC 1407). Each of these sections confer citizenship on persons living in these territories as of a certain date, and usually confer natural-born status on persons born in those territories after that date.For example, for Puerto Rico, all persons born in Puerto Rico between April 11, 1899, and January 12, 1941, are automatically conferred citizenship as of the date the law was signed by the President (June 27, 1952). Additionally, all persons born in Puerto Rico on or after January 13, 1941, are natural-born citizens of the United States.Note that because of when the law was passed, for some, the natural-born status was retroactive. The law contains one other section of historical note, concerning the Panama Canal Zone and the nation of Panama. In 8 USC 1403, the law states thatanyone born in the Canal Zone or in Panama itself, on or after February 26, 1904, to a mother and/or father who is a United States citizen, was "declared" to be a United States citizen.Note that the terms "natural-born" or "citizen at birth" are missing from this section. In 2008, when Arizona Senator John McCain ran for president on the Republican ticket, some theorized thatbecause McCain was born in the Canal Zone, he was not actually qualified to be president. However, it should be noted that section 1403 was written to apply to a small group of people to whom section 1401 did not apply. McCain is a natural-born citizen under 8 USC 1401(c):"a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents both of whom are citizens of the United States and one of whom has had a residence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions, prior to the birth of such person."Not everyone agrees that this section includes McCain - - but absent a court ruling either way, we must presume citizenship. U.S. Nationals A "national" is a person who is considered under the legal protection of a country, while not necessarily a citizen. National status is generally conferred on persons who lived in places acquired by the U.S. before the date of acquisition. A person can be a national-at-birth under a similar set of rules for a natural-born citizen. U.S. nationals must go through the same processes as an immigrant to become a full citizen. U.S. nationals who become citizens are not considered natural-born. (Continued

WOW! Your typeface IS bigger than mine! ;-)

One thing grandpa taught me is

To teach a Jack@$$, FIRST you got to get its ATTENTION !

You pinged your own vanity, vanity post? A first?

Hogwash.

Agreed. We are in a battle of survival of western civilisation and this is what comes out?

At 1st they are socialists, but when they realize that doesn’t work they become either communists or fascists, lasting until they are killed off by external forces, or commit suicide by imploding on their excesses and brutality.

You could always escalate with flashing text!

Really cute! Hey, you may be correct: America may be ready for the One World Order plan Heidi Curz worked on at the CFR and Goldman Sacks! What better way to start that with a Canadian President of the United States of America!